 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1913 - 804 páginas
...of defendant. The case is brought here upon a writ of error. Errors are assigned by appellant upon the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in his favor, and because a verdict was directed in favor of defendant. The declaration filed in this case was the ordinary... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1901 - 864 páginas
...NW 269); 112 Mich. 584 (70 NW 1106); and 117 Mich. 108 (75 NW 294). The plaintiff alleges error upon the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in his favor, but we think that he was not entitled to such instruction, as he failed to show conclusively that he... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1892 - 830 páginas
...DELIVERY— See DEED (2). DIRECTING VERDICT. 1. A defendant who has not rested his case cannot except to the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in his favor. Kelso v. Woodruff, 299. DIRECTING VERDICT— Continued. 2. The question whether plaintiff was the procuring... | |
 | South Carolina. Supreme Court, J. S. G. Richardson, Robert Wallace Shand, Cyprian Melanchthon Efird, William Hay Townsend, Duncan C. Ray, William Munro Shand - 1916 - 614 páginas
...jury found for defendant, and, from judgment on the verdict, plaintiff appealed, assigning error in the refusal of the Court to direct a verdict in his favor, and in the refusal of certain requests to charge, and in certain remarks made by the Court, in the presence... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1913 - 676 páginas
...could not possibly have been misled by it, to the prejudice of defendant. Appellant also complains of the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in his favor. In support of this assignment of error, counsel for appellant contends with much earnestness that there... | |
 | 1915 - 1322 páginas
...instructions, and a verdict returned for defendant, from which plaintiff has appealed, and assigned as error the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in his favor and the giving over his exceptions certain instructions for defendant. Mclleynolds & Halliburton, of Carthage,... | |
 | 1889 - 1080 páginas
...favor, which was denied. He did not ask to have any question submitted to the jury, but excepled to the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in his favor, and to the direction which was given. The only question presented to the court below was whether, on the... | |
 | 1889 - 1086 páginas
...and available to the appellant on the motion for a new trial, even though there was no exception to the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in his favor. The judgment and order should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant, to... | |
 | Vermont. Supreme Court - 1894 - 786 páginas
...and to the foregoing charge of the court, the respondent excepted. The respondent also excepted to the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in his favor. The respondent introduced no testimony. EA Cook for the respondent. The court should have directed... | |
| |
Appellant assigns as errors the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in his favor and the overruling of his motion for a new trial. 
