...defendants who pleaded guilty, to the testimony of Officer Moe, to the charge of the court, and to the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in his favor. No testimony was introduced by the respondent. EA Cook, for the respondent. WW Miles, state's attorney,...

...finding of the jury will not be disturbed. But there is another reason why the plaintiff's exception to the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in his favor on the third cause of action is untenable. The case of Fleischman \. Toplitz (13-t X. Y. 349) is authority...

...found was unproved, in which case an exception by the party against whom the verdict was directed, to the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in his favor, would be well taken. Among the controverted questions of fact which were settled by the verdict was...

...tried to a jury and where both parties requested the court to direct a verdict and the contestor after the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in his favor, failed to request that any specific issue of fact be submitted to the jury, waived his right and the...

...benefit of the first trial — having preserved a wayside bill of exceptions — and was entitled to have the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in his favor on the earlier trial reviewed and passed upon by the appellate courts. This presents a question of...

...hill, and to a point about 25 feet beyond, when the collision occurred. The defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court to direct a verdict In his favor, because of the alleged insufficiency of the evidence and error in giving certain instructions; also...

...hill and to a point about 25 feet beyond, when the collision occurred. The defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in his favor because of the alleged insufficiency of the evidence, and error in giving certain instructions; also...

...Railroad Company, with intent to steal, the plaintiff in error complains only of the refusal of the trial court to direct a verdict in his favor, and the overruling of his motion to set aside the verdict. The breaking and entering charged are fully established. But mental irresponsibility...

...the duty of the court to direct a verdict in this case ; the plaintiff insisting that it is the duty of the court to direct a verdict in his favor ; and the defendants claim that it is the duty of the court to direct a verdict in their favor ..." From acquiescence...

...plaintiff assigning as error the amount of the judgment recovered by him, and defendant assigning as error the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in his favor. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Messrs. Corthell, McCoIlough, & 186, 38...