...shipments. [20] As the Supreme Court has observed in United States v. Philadelphia National Bank: * * * [a] merger which produces a firm controlling an undue...increase in the concentration of firms in that market, is so inherently likely to lessen competition substantially that it must be enjoined in the absence of...

...case.1* Mr. Justice Brennan, speaking for the Court, would go only this far : "Specifically, we think that a merger which produces a firm controlling an...in a significant increase in the concentration of flrms in the market, is so inherently likely to lessen competition substantially that it must be enjoined...

...proof of market structure, market behavior, or probable anticompetitive effects. Specifically, we think that a merger which produces a firm controlling an...increase in the concentration of firms in that market, is so inherently likely to lessen competition substantially that it must be enjoined in the absence of...

...in which the largest bank controlled under 30 percent of the resources.12 The Court also suggested that — * * * A merger which produces a firm controlling...percentage share of the relevant market, and results in ft significant increase in the concentration of firms in that market (provides a test which is) fully...

...States 370 US 343 (1962). In Philadelphia Snlirtiial Bank, the Court referred specifically to "a mercer which produces a firm controlling an undue percentage share of the relevant ma-- ket." 374 US 363 (1963). e* ". . . where concentration is gaining momentum in a market, we must...

...figures have relevance under the Columbia Steel test, they perhaps speak against the appellee. • The presumption which the Court laid down in Philadelphia...Compare Times-Picayune Pub. Co. v. United States, 345 U. 8. 594, 612, a Sherman Act case in which the Court noted that "no magic inheres in numbers," and...

...proof of market structure, market behavior, or probable anticompetitive effects. Specifically, we think that a merger which produces a firm controlling an...increase in the concentration of firms in that market, is so inherently likely to lessen competition substantially that it must be enjoined in the absence of...

...proof of market structure, market behavior, or probable anticompetitive effects. Specifically, we think that a merger which produces a firm controlling an...increase in the concentration of firms in that market, is so inherently likely to lessen competition substantially tlint it must be enjoined in the absence of...

...rule is us follows : "* * * Specifically, we think that a merger which produces a firm controlling and undue percentage share of the relevant market, and...increase in the concentration of firms in that market, is so inherently likely to lessen competition substantially that it must be enjoined * * *. "Such a test...

...effects. Specifically, we think that a merger which produces a firm controlling an undue perceutage share of the relevant market, and results in a significant...increase in the concentration of firms in that market, is so inherently likely to lessen competition substantially that it must be enjoined in the absence of...