HomeGroupsTalkMoreZeitgeist
Search Site
This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and (if not signed in) for advertising. By using LibraryThing you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Your use of the site and services is subject to these policies and terms.

Results from Google Books

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.

Peripheral Vision by Patricia Ferguson
Loading...

Peripheral Vision (original 2007; edition 2008)

by Patricia Ferguson

MembersReviewsPopularityAverage ratingMentions
679394,053 (3.27)11
This review was written for LibraryThing Early Reviewers.
Sylvia is a medical specialist; in the nomenclature of the United Kingdom, she is a consultant. Her specialty is eye surgery, and her work with those who have impaired vision forms the continuing metaphor for all of the characters of this confused and confusing novel.

We meet Sylvia first in 1995, shortly after she has had her first baby. Immediately after we learn how tired this baby has made her, we flash back to the tale of how she and her partner came to be together. We learn of the troubled birth of her child, and her lack of love for the infant – and by the end of the chapter, we’re 20 years in the future, after Sylvia has spent all this time caring for a child she did not love.

Do we get the story of how this relationship works next? No; oddly enough, that story is never told in this book. Instead, after 23 pages we switch to Will and his mother, the latter dying, the former a “resting” actor who is taking care of her. After introducing the characters, Ferguson suddenly whisks us to 1953 and the story of an accident suffered by a young boy named George, which tells us about a number of individuals who will come to occupy different niches in this continuing story: George (who has managed to put his eye out), Ruby (his mother), Iris (one of George’s nurses), and Rob (one of the medical students who has observed the surgery).

Then it’s back to 1995 and more about Sylvia for three pages, then back to Will for six pages – and then we’re in 1954, and Rob and Iris are now a couple. The reader now feels dizzy and disoriented, especially because there is no connection at all between any of the characters in the 1950s and the characters in the 1990s; why are these stories all jumbled together?

The answers are very slow in coming, with one revelation uncovered only in the final two or three pages of the book, entirely unforeseen or unforeseeable, and encompassed in a single sentence. In an effort to produce a complicated plot, it seems that the author has started so many threads that she dropped a few stitches somewhere along the line, and has simply gathered them up into a big heaping mess and tied them in a bow at the end of the book.

It’s unfortunate, because there are so many threads that would have supported interesting stories all on their own. I’d like to know more about Sylvia’s relationship with her child, Clio, for instance. By the end of the first chapter I know that Sylvia “was to live for twenty years in the closest possible service of someone she did not love,” but I don’t know what this means, precisely. Is she a cold mother who leaves her child’s care to a nanny, faking enthusiasm on those occasions when she cannot avoid Clio’s company? Is her devotion explained solely by the generous financial support she is able to give the child based on her income as an eye surgeon? How does Clio react to her mother’s disinterested devotion – a contradiction in terms if there ever was one? This could be an entire book in itself, but in fact we learn almost nothing about Clio except that her mother doesn’t love her.

Nor do we learn enough about eye surgery to justify it as a continuing metaphor. There are a few tantalizing tidbits, but this isn’t a story of anyone’s career in the field. It is a merely a device, which diminishes both the force of the metaphor and the power of the book as a whole. I would have enjoyed reading more about eye surgery in the 1950s compared to the 1990s, and the miracles that can be wrought with these strange orbs we all carry in our heads, and use for the sublime pleasure of reading books. Instead, though, we learn tiny bits about England’s class system, lingerie in the immediate aftermath of World War II, French cheeses, British sitcoms and a dozen other things.

I was surprised to read on the cover of this book that it was long-listed for the Orange Prize when it was first published in Great Britain in 2007, and even more surprised to read that this is the author’s sixth novel. I would have guessed that this was a first novel by someone not yet in control of her evident gifts at characterization and historical accuracy. It is promising in some ways, but ultimately no more than an interesting failure.

Peripheral Vision is Patricia Ferguson’s first novel to cross the Atlantic and see publication in the United States. And perhaps that explains it: the book simply didn’t translate to this American reader. ( )
  TerryWeyna | Mar 2, 2010 |
Showing 10 of 10
Beautifully written tales ( )
  LTK | Mar 29, 2011 |
This review was written for LibraryThing Early Reviewers.
Sylvia is a medical specialist; in the nomenclature of the United Kingdom, she is a consultant. Her specialty is eye surgery, and her work with those who have impaired vision forms the continuing metaphor for all of the characters of this confused and confusing novel.

We meet Sylvia first in 1995, shortly after she has had her first baby. Immediately after we learn how tired this baby has made her, we flash back to the tale of how she and her partner came to be together. We learn of the troubled birth of her child, and her lack of love for the infant – and by the end of the chapter, we’re 20 years in the future, after Sylvia has spent all this time caring for a child she did not love.

Do we get the story of how this relationship works next? No; oddly enough, that story is never told in this book. Instead, after 23 pages we switch to Will and his mother, the latter dying, the former a “resting” actor who is taking care of her. After introducing the characters, Ferguson suddenly whisks us to 1953 and the story of an accident suffered by a young boy named George, which tells us about a number of individuals who will come to occupy different niches in this continuing story: George (who has managed to put his eye out), Ruby (his mother), Iris (one of George’s nurses), and Rob (one of the medical students who has observed the surgery).

Then it’s back to 1995 and more about Sylvia for three pages, then back to Will for six pages – and then we’re in 1954, and Rob and Iris are now a couple. The reader now feels dizzy and disoriented, especially because there is no connection at all between any of the characters in the 1950s and the characters in the 1990s; why are these stories all jumbled together?

The answers are very slow in coming, with one revelation uncovered only in the final two or three pages of the book, entirely unforeseen or unforeseeable, and encompassed in a single sentence. In an effort to produce a complicated plot, it seems that the author has started so many threads that she dropped a few stitches somewhere along the line, and has simply gathered them up into a big heaping mess and tied them in a bow at the end of the book.

It’s unfortunate, because there are so many threads that would have supported interesting stories all on their own. I’d like to know more about Sylvia’s relationship with her child, Clio, for instance. By the end of the first chapter I know that Sylvia “was to live for twenty years in the closest possible service of someone she did not love,” but I don’t know what this means, precisely. Is she a cold mother who leaves her child’s care to a nanny, faking enthusiasm on those occasions when she cannot avoid Clio’s company? Is her devotion explained solely by the generous financial support she is able to give the child based on her income as an eye surgeon? How does Clio react to her mother’s disinterested devotion – a contradiction in terms if there ever was one? This could be an entire book in itself, but in fact we learn almost nothing about Clio except that her mother doesn’t love her.

Nor do we learn enough about eye surgery to justify it as a continuing metaphor. There are a few tantalizing tidbits, but this isn’t a story of anyone’s career in the field. It is a merely a device, which diminishes both the force of the metaphor and the power of the book as a whole. I would have enjoyed reading more about eye surgery in the 1950s compared to the 1990s, and the miracles that can be wrought with these strange orbs we all carry in our heads, and use for the sublime pleasure of reading books. Instead, though, we learn tiny bits about England’s class system, lingerie in the immediate aftermath of World War II, French cheeses, British sitcoms and a dozen other things.

I was surprised to read on the cover of this book that it was long-listed for the Orange Prize when it was first published in Great Britain in 2007, and even more surprised to read that this is the author’s sixth novel. I would have guessed that this was a first novel by someone not yet in control of her evident gifts at characterization and historical accuracy. It is promising in some ways, but ultimately no more than an interesting failure.

Peripheral Vision is Patricia Ferguson’s first novel to cross the Atlantic and see publication in the United States. And perhaps that explains it: the book simply didn’t translate to this American reader. ( )
  TerryWeyna | Mar 2, 2010 |
This review was written for LibraryThing Early Reviewers.
I just received an e-mail reminding me that I didn't review this book. The fact that I received this book a year ago and never finished reading it is pretty much the review. I liked what I read, but it certainly didn't pull me under like some books have the power to do. I never truly became connected (either positively or negatively) to any of the characters. I'm not opposed to finishing this book at some time, but for the time being there are more compelling titles on my to-read list.
  JennyG | Oct 2, 2009 |
This review was written for LibraryThing Early Reviewers.
I had trouble getting all the way through Peripheral Vision. It wasn't complicated, it was merely terribly dull. The writing felt strained and overwrought, and the plot didn't interest me at all. The first ninety percent of the book wanders sort of aimlessly between present and past, presumably to flesh out characters that the reader doesn't particularly care about, then rushes to it's strange conclusion.

There might have been a good story in here somewhere, but it was choked out and the resulting book was a complete bore. ( )
  shoesonwrong | Aug 3, 2009 |
Unlike many of the previous reviewers, I really enjoyed this book, both the structure and the writing. I liked the way we got little snippets of each character's life, then moved on to the next, then circled back...All along I was trying to figure out how they would all intersect - and that was the only disappointing part of the book - the ending, as one reviewer put it, felt rushed, and also contrived. It almost felt like she got tired of writing it at the end and just wanted it to be all wrapped up. ( )
  bobbieharv | Jun 18, 2009 |
This review was written for LibraryThing Early Reviewers.
Peripheral Vision starts out slowly. Ferguson's style tends to be more telling than showing, or perhaps it's simply more narrative than action. By chapter four I was confused. I didn't see any connection to the characters from one chapter to the next. I persevered, but it was slow going. Despite that, her characters became compelling to me. Although Sylvia is the main character, according to the back cover blurb, I found Iris and Ruby to be more compelling. The only thing that kept me reading was wondering how all these characters were connected. About two thirds of the way through there was a hint of connections. By this time the characters had also managed to become "real" to me and continuing was easy. By the time I finished this book I had to agree with the back blurb: "Peripheral Vision is a funny and clever novel about love and the lack of it; about motherhood, sight, and insight; and about the different ways we experience and transcend suffering."
One of the really great things about this novel is that I could not guess what was going to happen next. Nothing was predictable. At the same time, nothing that happened seemed wrong or forced. It all seemed natural. The story wrapped things up at the end, but not in a tidy little box. I like stories with a beginning, middle and end, but I don't like formulaic or 'pat' endings. I also don't care for stories that leave me wondering as much at the end as I did at the beginning. Peripheral Vision manages to find that middle ground. ( )
  Airycat | Feb 5, 2009 |
This review was written for LibraryThing Early Reviewers.
Metaphors used subtly rather than as a bludgeon are more to my liking. Vision in all its literal and figurative guises is bludgeoned to death in Patricia Ferguson’s Peripheral Vision. Ferguson steps in and, like an annoying eye doctor who keeps shoving lenses in front of your eyes to blurry your vision, and keeps interfering with this novel’s stories. While Ferguson’s love for even her most disagreeable characters shines through in the attention she gives to each little detail of their lives, the larger dramatic arc of this novel is completely manhandled. There was a distinct lack of balance between the many plot lines. While the plot line involving Sylvia, the eye surgeon and her longtime, now suffering friend, Will held little drama and mystery, the stories of Iris the depressed nurse and Ruby the depressed mother were much more intriguing. In the end, when all mysteries are finally revealed, I wanted to throw the book against the wall. Was I really reading Sylvia and Will’s story to discover in one final paragraph that (spoiler) they were related?! And what of poor George, Ruby’s son – was it really necessary to withhold the cause of his childhood eye accident for so long? And Iris? She was the biggest disappointment of all – to have read chapters in her point of view, then have her sister say we should have disregarded the Iris behind the curtain because she was damaged – well, that’s just an author putting her nose into a plot where it doesn’t belong. Iris should have been permitted to tell her own story, the whole one. And Ruby disappearing into an off-stage happy ending was a disservice to an otherwise finely wrought character. Vision was supposed to carry this novel’s load, but it’s back broke for me halfway through. ( )
  kvanuska | Dec 29, 2008 |
This review was written for LibraryThing Early Reviewers.
This book is much like a flower. As a shoot, it's pleasant enough. As it buds and then begins to bloom, however, it becomes much more complex and beautiful. All of the characters are interesting, and their lives intersect in a multitude of ways that do not become fully clear until the very end, which adds suspense to the literary pleasure.

My one complaint about the book is that it seemed to rush to its conclusions at the end, whereas it grew on you slowly, slowly in the beginning. It seemed to me that the author suddenly felt like she was coming up on her page limit and decided to wrap everything up in a bit of a hurry.

Another enjoyable early reviewer's book for me!! ( )
  jhedlund | Dec 8, 2008 |
This review was written for LibraryThing Early Reviewers.
I quite liked this novel. I have to admit I was a bit wary when I started that I would end up in the midst of a Grey's Anatomy-type soap opera, but it unfolded into a thoughtful look at the human condition. Despite the time shifts in time back and forth from the 1950s to the 1990s and in perspective from one character to another, this is a rather old-fashioned novel of manners. It's very English, and by this, I don't mean British or post-colonial -- it's English through and through. The society depicted in the novel, both in the 1950s and in the 1990s, is untouched by post-colonial immigrant influence. Those in the 1950s cope with rationed foodstuffs, and those in the 1990s with a more-than-adequate, but somewhat rationed health system. Nevertheless, they face the problems we all face -- parent-child relationships, accidents, sickness, the need for love, guilt. If you like Jane Austen or Margaret Drabble, you should like this novel. ( )
1 vote janeajones | Dec 3, 2008 |
So this book went: Angst, eye surgery, angst, eye surgery, suicide, cancer, affair with an eye surgeon, suicide, more eye surgery, angst. I didn't care enough about most of the characters to find their woes interesting, and the eye surgery made me feel ill.

I also thought it could do with another proofread. There was one chapter title on the lines of "Character X meets Character Y" when character X wasn't even in the chapter, and a lot of sentences that looked as if the author had changed her mind halfway through and ended up either making no sense or completely lacking any semblance of grammar. ( )
  tronella | Mar 12, 2008 |
Showing 10 of 10

LibraryThing Early Reviewers Alum

Patricia Ferguson's book Peripheral Vision was available from LibraryThing Early Reviewers.

Current Discussions

None

Popular covers

Quick Links

Rating

Average: (3.27)
0.5
1 2
1.5
2 2
2.5 3
3 2
3.5 5
4 8
4.5 1
5 1

Is this you?

Become a LibraryThing Author.

 

About | Contact | Privacy/Terms | Help/FAQs | Blog | Store | APIs | TinyCat | Legacy Libraries | Early Reviewers | Common Knowledge | 204,711,617 books! | Top bar: Always visible