...suppose a superiority of the judicial to the legislative power. It only supposes that the power of the people is superior to both ; and that where the will of the legislature declared iii its statutes, stands in opposition to that of the people declared in the constitution, the judges...

...suppose a superioritv of the judicial to the legislative power. It only supposes that the power of s]9 .M w 8 y d $ H0|N}2 Q F4G34cf o w U zn...l %n-lg ` ` q XT 5 a~ ;by - Do-^ ,s < (X p; iu a familiar instance. It not uncommonly happens, that there are two statutes existing at one time,...

...means suppose a superiority of the judiciary to the legislative. It only supposes that the power of the people is superior to both, and that where the will of the legislature, declared in statutes, stands in opposition to that of the people, declared in the constitution, the judges ought...

...suppose the superiority of the judicial to the legislative power. It only supposes that the power of the people is superior to both ; and that where the...fundamental laws rather than by those which are not fundamental."1 1 The Federalist, LXXVIII. In the Massachusetts Convention of 1820, Webster, in discussing...

...will of the legislature, declared in its statutes, stands in opposition to that declared by the people in the constitution, the judges ought to be governed...latter rather than the former. They ought to regulate Concluisiveness of Judicial Decisions. But a question which has arisen and been passed upon in one...

...suppose a superiority 6f the judicial to the legislative power. It only supposes that the power of the people is superior to both; and that where the...laws rather than by those which are not fundamental." There is, therefore, no historical basis for the assertion that the power to interpret the Constitution...

...the will of the people shall prevail and that the courts are the better interpreters of that will. " Where the will of the legislature, declared in its...laws, rather than by those which are not fundamental." 3 Hamilton admitted that to a certain degree this was a rule of construction not derived 1 The Federalist,...

...suppose a superiority of the judicial to the legislative power. It only supposes that the power of the people is superior to both; and that where the...laws, rather than by those which are not fundamental. .,. . . If, then, the courts of justice are to be considered as the bulwarks of a limited Constitution...

..."suppose a superiority of the judicial to the legislative power. It only supposes that the power of the people is superior to both; and that where the...latter rather than the former. They ought to regulate 1 "The Federalist," No. 78 (Dawson's ed.). their decisions by the fundamental laws, rather than by...

...means suppose a superiority of the judicial to legislative power. It only supposes that the power of the people is superior to both; and that where the...be governed by the latter, rather than the former." The right or power to incorporate was one of those "certain specified exceptions" to the legislative...