...and it is asserted it should be set aside upon two grounds: First, that at the time of its execution Ϡ0~ ~ t a j Ƣ > C l޴ # w ٷ眅(A w s #{莣 second, its execution was produced by undue intluence. The last reason assigned we will first dispose...

...a devisee under the will. HART, J., (after stating the facts). The will was contested on the ground that the testator was not of sound and disposing mind and memory, and also that the execution of the will was procured by undue influence. The jury, by its verdict, found...

...and it is asserted it should be set aside upon two grounds, first, tliat at the time of its execution testator was not of sound and disposing mind and memory ; and that second, its execution was produced by undue influence. " The last reason assigned we will first dispose...

...the probate court by his wife, Margaret Mitchell, 011 the grounds that it was not lawfully executed; that the testator was not of sound and disposing mind and memory; and that "he signed the same under duress, menace, undue influence, and fraud." From the decree of the probate...

...were not present nor heard the testator order, direct and " 'littate his will to the notary ; 2nd, that the testator was not " of sound and disposing mind and memory at the time the " said will was made ; 3rd, that the will was not written by " the said notarv in the...

...contested in the Supreme Judicial Court between the present plaintiff and defendant, on the ground that the testator was not of sound and disposing mind and memory at the time of signing the will, was admitted in evidence without objection. Held, that a ruling that...

...case is a contest over the will of one Thomas Hntchinson, deceased, it being insisted by appellant that the testator was not of sound and disposing mind and memory at the times when he executed the instruments purporting to be his last will and testament and a codicil...

...Tucker, for appellee. HART, J. (after stating the facts as above). The will was contested on the ground that the testator was not of sound and disposing mind and memory, and also that the execution of the will was procured by undue influence. The jury, by its verdict, found...

...petition is Nov. 1910.] ESTATE OP KILBORN. 595 uncertain in that it does not set forth any facts showing that the testator was not of sound and disposing mind and memory and not acting under duress or menace or fraud, or undue influence of any person whatever, at the time...

...that of Dr. Martin, to which we have just referred, that could in any way be construed as indicating that the testator was not of sound and disposing mind and memory at or about the time the will was executed or at any other time, or that there was anything in his...