 | Oliver Lorenzo Barbour, New York (State). Supreme Court - 1858 - 718 páginas
...corporation can have no legal existence out of the boundaries of the sovereignty by which it is created, must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty. (Bank of Augusta v. Earle, 13 Peters, 519. Runyan v. Lessees of Coster, 14 id. 129.) III. A corporation... | |
 | Richard Peters - 1860 - 836 páginas
...law, and by force of the law; and where that law ceases to operate, and is no longer obligatory, the corporation can have no existence. It must dwell in...creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty. But although it must live and have its being in that slate only, yet it does not by any means follow... | |
 | Daniel Gardner - 1860 - 740 páginas
...law ceases to operate, and is no longer obligatory, that the corporation can have no existence ; that it must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty. But a corporation may act and contract in any foreign nation, and much more in any other State of our... | |
 | Richard Peters - 1860 - 792 páginas
...law, and by force of the law, and where that law ceases to operate, and is no longer obligatory, the corporation can have no existence. It must dwell in the place of ils creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty. But although it must live and have its being... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1911 - 726 páginas
...authority of the sovereignty in which it wishes to act. As was said in Augusta v. Earle, 13 Pet. 519: "It must dwell in the place of its creation and cannot migrate to another sovereignty." Having no absolute right of recognition in other States but depending for such recognition and enforcement... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1862 - 658 páginas
...it. Indeed, this court has said, in the case of the Bank of Augusta vs. Earle, that a corporation " must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereign ty." 13 Pet., 588. And in Runyan vs. Lessee of Coster this court again said : "A corporation... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1863 - 654 páginas
...of law, and by force of law ; and where that law ceases to operate, and is no longer obligatory, the corporation can have no existence. It must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to anAspinwall et al. v. The Ohio and Mississippi 11. 11. Co. et al. other sovereignty. But, although... | |
 | Oliver Lorenzo Barbour - 1863 - 732 páginas
...of law and by force of the law, and when that law ceases to operate and is no longer obligatory, the corporation can have no existence. It must dwell in the place of its creation and cannot emigrate to another sovereignty." In the case of The People v. The Trustees of Geneva College, (5 Wend.... | |
 | Elliott Anthony - 1865 - 320 páginas
...State. It can have no legal existence out of the boundaries of the sovereignty by which it is created, must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty. The case of McCall v. Byram Manufacturing Company, 5 Conn., has been regarded as deciding, that corporations... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1909 - 746 páginas
...decided that " a corporation can have no legal existence outside of the place in which it was created ; must dwell in the place of its creation, and cannot migrate to another sovereignty." For, though a non-resident corporation, it might contract, through its agents, within the District... | |
| |
It is very true that a corporation can have no legal existence out of the boundaries of the sovereignty by which it is created. It exists only in contemplation of law, and by force of the law ; and where that law ceases to operate, and is no longer obligatory,... 
