| 1895 - 866 páginas
...den, 9 Wheat. 1, 196, Chief Justice Marshall said, as to this power to regulate commerce : " It is the power to regulate; that is, to prescribe the rule...which commerce is to be governed. This power, like all other vested in Congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges... | |
| Ellen Frankel Paul, Howard Dickman - 1989 - 316 páginas
...the commerce power. But again his words must be set in context. Chief Justice Marshall thus wrote: "This power, like all others vested in Congress, is...exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations other than are prescribed in the constitution." 43 But he continued: If, as has always... | |
| California. Supreme Court - 1906 - 762 páginas
...the act of Congress, is within the power to regulate commerce. This power to regulate is the power " to prescribe the rule by which commerce is to be governed....exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations, other than those prescribed in the Constitution." 9 Wheaton. 196. The power of Congress... | |
| Luther S. Luedtke - 1992 - 588 páginas
...across state boundaries and into states. Congress's power to regulate interstate and foreign commerce, "like all others vested in Congress, is complete in...exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations other than those prescribed in the Constitution." Third, he held that the state governments... | |
| California. Supreme Court - 1924 - 962 páginas
...declaration that the power of Congress to regulate commerce among the several states is supreme and plenary; "is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost extent and acknowledges no limitations other than are prescribed in the Constitution." It is needless to cite in detail the almost... | |
| David P. Currie - 1992 - 518 páginas
...Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US (9 Wheat.) 1, 196 (1826) (Marshall, CJ), supra chapter 6 ("to regulate ... is, to prescribe the rule by which commerce is to be governed"). Given this holding, the Court could sustain the Great Lakes Act only if the case was maritime, and... | |
| Bernard Schwartz - 1993 - 480 páginas
...equally liberal view of the meaning of the verb "regulate." "What is this power?" he asked. "It is the power to regulate; that is, to prescribe the rule...complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost extent."s3 According to the most recent history of the Marshall Court, however, Marshall's Gihhons... | |
| Abraham L. Davis, Barbara Luck Graham - 1995 - 512 páginas
...Chief Justice Marshall, referring to another specific legislative authorization in the Constitution, "This power, like all others vested in Congress, is...exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations, other than are prescribed in the constitution." Gibbons v, Ogden. 9 Wheat. 1,1 96 [1824].... | |
| |