...indicate; for, as the law has provided a definite succession in the absence of disposition, it would lie unjust to allow the right of this ascertained object to be superseded by the claim of anyone, not pointed out by the testator with equal distinctness.' 1 Jarman. Wills, 315. From a careful...

...court to dispose of It as may be supposed the testator would have done. "In the construction of wills, conjecture is not permitted to supply what the testator...pointed out by the testator with equal distinctness." 1 Jarm. Wills, *326. If it be a presumption that the testator knew of the provision of the statute...

...court to dispose of it as may be supposed the testator would have done. "In the construction of wills, conjecture Is not permitted to supply what the testator...the absence of disposition, it would be unjust to nllow the right of this ascertained object to lie superseded by the claim of any one not pointed out...

...cases make bad law, and that way lies danger. "Conjecture," said Mr. Jarman in his book 0I1 wills " is not permitted to supply what the testator has failed...ascertained object to be superseded by the claim of anyone not pointed out by the testator with equal distinctness." (Jarman on Wills, 6th Edn., p. 453)....

...has involved his Intention, the failure of the intended disposition is the inevitable consequence. Conjecture Is not permitted to supply what the testator has failed to Indicate; for the law has provided a definite successor In the absence of disposition, and It would be nnjust to...