...California 328 US 440 ( 1946) ) ; and others. So for over a century our national policy has been for regulation and taxation by the several states of the business of insurance. That policy is grounded in deliberate Congressional enactment. The reasons for it have been amply stated...

...California 328 US 440 (1946) ) ; and others. So for over a century our national policy has been for regulation and taxation by the several states of the business of insurance. That policy is grounded in deliberate Congressional enactment. The reasons for it have been amply stated...

...California 328 US 440 (1946) ) ; and others. So for over a century our national policy has been for regulation and taxation by the several states of the business of insurance. That policy is grounded in deliberate Congressional enactment. The reasons for it have been amply stated...

...McCarran-Ferguson Act, 15 USC §§ 1011-15, which opens with the declaration that "The continued regulation and the taxation by the several States of the business of insurance is in the public interest." Id. § 1011. To remove the federal government from the field of insurance regulation, the Act further...

...McCarran-Ferguson Act, 15 USC § 1011-1.". which opens with the declaration that "The continued regulatioi nrl the taxation by the several States of the business of insurance is in th nblic interest." Id. § 1011. To remove the federal government from the fiel C insurance regulation,...

...regulate taxation of Interstate commerce was the adoption In 1945 of the McCarran Act which provides that "the Congress hereby declares that the continued...the public interest, and that silence on the part of Congress shall not be construed to impose any barrier to the regulation or taxation of such business...

...contrary to the mandate of the McCarran-Ferguson Act (Public Law 15, 78th Congress) which provided: ". . . the Congress hereby declares that the continued regulation...business of insurance is in the public interest." policy has boon reviewed several times over the years, particularly by the Senate Antitrust and Monopoly...

...contrary to the mandate of the McCarran-Ferguson Act (Public Law 15, 78th Congress) which provided: ". . . the Congress hereby declares that the continued regulation...business of insurance is in the public interest." policy has been reviewed several times over the years, particularly by the Senate Antitrust and Monopoly...

...provision designed to guarantee that the state would continue to regulate insurance. It states : "Congress declares that the continued regulation and taxation...the business of insurance is in the public interest. . . .'' (15 USCA section 1011). S. 354, in philosophy and in specific terms, runs counter to the express...

...provision designed to guarantee thet the state would continue to regulate insurnnee. It states: "Congress declares that the continued regulation and taxation...the business of insurance is in the public interest. . . ." (15 USCA section 1011). S. 354, in philosophy and in specific terms, runs counter to the express...