...construction to this statute. The question then arises, What is intended or meant by the following words — "any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property"— in the statute here involved I Counsel advance the further contention that the Superior Court of Marion...

...§ 8o3) authorizing a suit against receiver, without first obtaining leave of court, in respect to any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with the property intrusted to him, does not authorize the beginning of an action of ejectment by a mortgagor...

...actions without previous leave of the court against a receiver appointed by a federal court in respect to any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with the property, is not necessarily termmated as to them by their subsequent discharge and the transfer...

...1887, as corrected by the act of August 13, 1888, (Sup. RSUS, p. 614,) every receiver, appointed by a court of the United States, may be sued in respect...of his in carrying on the business connected with the property, without the previous leave of the court by which such receiver was appointed ; the suit...

...particularly with respect to receivers appointed by the federal courts. By act of Congress/2 a receiver appointed by any court of the United States may be sued in respect of any act of his own without previous leave of court, and, presumably, this is broad enough to permit an action...

...is not within the federal judiciary act (25 US Stat. at Large, 433), providing that "every receiver of any property appointed by any court of the United...previous leave of the court in which such receiver was appointed." Clukies v. Bank of NY, 74 App. Div. 38; 76 NY Supp. 826. b. Whert and when granted....

...not exceeding one year, or by both such punishments, in the discretion of the court. "Sec. 3. That every receiver or manager of any property appointed...property, without the previous leave of the court in which euch receiver or manager was appointed : but such suit shall be subject to the general equity jurisdiction...

...that the latter act authorizes suits against the receiver, without leave of the court appointing him, "In respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property." The statute of this state seems to provide for such suit In all cases where there is a cause of action...

...department held that in an action brought against a receiver appointed by a federal court, not relating to any "act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property," it was still necessary for the complaint to allege that leave to bring the action had been obtained,...

...that the latter Act authorizes suits against the receiver without leave of the court appointing him "in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property." The statute of this State seems to provide for such suit in all cases where there is a cause of action...