 | New York (State). Courts - 1906 - 800 páginas
...language of Judge McAdam in Connelly v. Rist, 20 Misc. Rep. 81, is applicable to this case. He says: "The true rule is that the injury must be the natural and necessary Supreme Court, July, 1906. [Vol. 48. consequence of the defendant's acts (Ryan v. RR Co.,... | |
 | William Francis Bailey - 1894 - 674 páginas
...difficulty may be avoided by adhering to the principle that, in determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural...might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act." The facts in the case to which this language was applied were that... | |
 | 1894 - 1228 páginas
...proximate cause. The rule on this subject is as follows: 'In determining what is the proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural...circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been seen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act. Tested by this rule, we regard the injury as... | |
 | Frederick Pollock - 1894 - 842 páginas
..."The true rule is that the injury must be the natural ami probable consequence ot the (defendant's) negligence — such a consequence, as, under the surrounding...and ought to have been foreseen by the wrong-doer as likely to flow from his act. This is not a limitation of the maxim causa proximo non remote spectatur;... | |
 | Indiana. Appellate Court - 1894 - 814 páginas
...agency is manifest, the question is one for the court, and that in determining what is proximate cause the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, such consequence, as under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been foreseen... | |
 | Frederick Pollock - 1894 - 842 páginas
...generally accepted and applied by the courts of the United States. Thus, in a leading case it was said : "The true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the (defendant's) negligence — such a consequence, as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case,... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1894 - 1070 páginas
...least as it applies to negligent acts, is that, "in determining what is the proximate cause, the trne rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence: Hoag r. Lake Shore etc. Ry. Co., 85 Pa. St. 293; 27 Am. Rep. 653; Pennsylvania RR Co. v. Ken; 62 Pa.... | |
 | 1897 - 830 páginas
...circumstances." In Hoagf. Railroad Co., 85 Pa. St. 293, 298, 299, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania said : "The true rule is that the injury must be the natural...and ought to have been foreseen by the wrongdoer, as likely to flow from the act." The question in this case, then, is, was it the natural and probable... | |
 | Francis Marion Burdick - 1895 - 628 páginas
...proximate cause. The rule on this subject is as follows : " In determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural...circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been seen by the wrong-doer as likely to flow from his act." (Railway Co. v. Taylor, 104 Pa. St. 306 ; Township... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1911 - 1026 páginas
...proximate cause. The rule on this subject is as follows: " In determining what is the proximate cause the true rule is that the injury must be the natural...consequence of the negligence; such a consequence aa under the surrounding circumstances of the case might and ought to have been seen by the wrongdoer... | |
| |
In determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence; such a consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been foreseen by the... 
