 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1881 - 896 páginas
...for the jury, who must determine whether the injury was the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company v. McEeen. natural and probable consequence of the negligence,...might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act. What would be more quickly apprehended, by one setting fire to dry... | |
 | 1882 - 264 páginas
...the proximate cause of an accident is that "the injury must be the natural and probable consequences of the negligence, such a consequence as under the...circumstances of the case might and ought to have been seen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act." — City of Lancaster i'. Kissinger, 13 Lancaster... | |
 | 1917 - 258 páginas
...natural and probable result of defendant's negligence. See King v. Lehigh Valley RR Co., 245 Pa. 25. as- under the surrounding circumstances of the case might and ought to be foreseen by the wrong doer as likely to flow from his acts;" Swansbn v. Crandall, supra; while such... | |
 | Charles Cole Hine, Walter S. Nichols - 1882 - 820 páginas
...of the cause of the injury. The rule for determining what is a proximate cause may be stated thus: that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence, and that this consequence might and ought to have been foreseen under the surrounding circumstances.... | |
 | Lawrence Lewis, Adelbert Hamilton, John Houston Merrill, William Mark McKinney, James Manford Kerr, John Crawford Thomson - 1883 - 760 páginas
...proximate or promotive cause, as defined by law. " That in determining what is proximity of cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural...and ought to have been foreseen by the wrong-doer as likely to flow from his act." Township of West Mahonoy v. Watson, (Sup. Ct. Pa., May 9, 1887.) 9... | |
 | 1914 - 448 páginas
...of the proximate cause." In Hoag z: Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway, 85 Pa., 293, it is said: "The injury must be the natural and probable consequence...might and ought to have been foreseen by the wrongdoer as likely to flow from his act." In Wallace v. Keystone Auto Co., 239 Pa., no, proximate cause is defined... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1883 - 958 páginas
...natural, foreseen and necessary result of such cause. * * * In determining what is proximate cause, the true rule Is, that the Injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence ; sucha consequence as under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been... | |
 | Henry Clay Brubaker, Charles Israel Landis, George Ross Eshleman, Issac Clinton Arnold - 1921 - 632 páginas
...unskillfulness was the proximate cause of the injury complained of. In determining what is proximate cause, the rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence : Robb v. Penna. Company, 186 Pa. 456. The burden is on the plaintiff to prove that the injury resulted... | |
 | Henry Taylor Terry - 1884 - 736 páginas
...property, which was set on fire and destroyed. It was held that the damage was too remote, it not being " such a consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances...and ought to have been foreseen by the wrong-doer as likely to flow from his act." It seems to me more correct to say that in the circumstances the engineer... | |
| |
In determining what is proximate cause, the true rule is that the injury must be the natural and probable consequence of the negligence; such a consequence as, under the surrounding circumstances of the case, might and ought to have been foreseen by the... 
