...conclusive, except that in the choice of trees to be planted, it shall be governed by the written request of the owners of a majority of the frontage on both sides of the street which it is proposed to plant. If the objections be sustained, no further proceedings shall be taken...

...districts of a city in the interest, of the safety, morality, health and decency of the community. The claim is palpably frivolous that the validity...billboard is to be erected. The plaintiff in error cannot ibe injured, but obviously may be benefited by this provision, for without it the prohibition of the...

...decency of the community." This point is made even clearer by the following language of the Court: "The claim is palpably frivolous that the validity...of a majority of the frontage on both sides of the streets in any block in which such billboards are to be erected. The plaintiff in error cannot be injured,...

...street bounding any such block are used exclusively for residence purposes, unless the written consent of the owners of a majority of the frontage on both sides of all the streets bounding the block in which it is proposed to locate, establish, conduct or maintain...

...street bounding any such block or used exclusively for residence purposes, unless the written consent of the owners of a majority of the frontage on both sides of all the streets bounding the block in which it is proposed to locate, establish, conduct or maintain...

...line of the city. Plaintiff does not allege, however, that the petition for the paving was signed by the owners of a majority of the frontage on both sides of either that part of the street called Columbia street, or that part called State street, which form...

...the street are used exclusively for residence purposes, without first obtaining the written consenj, of the owners of a majority of the frontage on both sides of the street in such block, may be prohibited in the exercise of the state's police power, and such prohibition works...

...provision which removes the prohibition as to any billboard the erection of which is first consented to by the owners of a majority of the frontage on both sides of the street in. the block in which it is to be erected. Eubank v. Richmond, 226 US 137, distinguished. He who is not...

...buildings are used exclusively for residence purposes, without first obtaining the written consent of the owners of a majority of the frontage on both sides of the street. The grounds upon which the billboard company attacked the validity of the ordinance are briefly discussed...

...residence districts of a city in the interest of the safety, morality, health and decency of the community. The claim is palpably frivolous that the validity...any block in which such billboard is to be erected. 391 The plaintiff in error cannot be injured, but obviously may be benefited by this provision, for...