...doctrine was thus laid down: "There must « some reasonable evidence of negligence. But where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant...the absence of explanation, that the accident arose from want of care." See also Priggs v. Oliver, 4 Hurl. & Colt. 403; sc, 35 LJ (Exch.) 163. As was well...

...that " where the thing" (goods suspended over the pavement, which fell and injured the plaintiff) " is shown to be under the management of the defendant...use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." In Moffatt...

...negligence. But where the thing is shown to be under the management of the de16 C. of L. — 29 fendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the...the absence of explanation, that the accident arose from want of care." See also Priggs v. Oliver, 4 Hurl. & Colt. 4°3'. s- c-. 35 L- J- (Exch.) 163....

...There *«iu3tbe reasonable evidence of negligence. •Bat, «hen the thing is shown to be under "lie management of the defendant or his "servants, and...use " proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, *m the absence of explanation by the de" tendant, that the accident arose from want •of care." On...

...defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as, under an ordinary course of things, does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of care. ' " The principle...

...or his servants, and the accident is such as, under an ordinary course of things, does not happen, if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explananation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care." The argument...

...thus laid down: "There must besóme reasonable evidence of negligence. But where the thing is shown lo be under the management of the defendant or his servants,...the absence of explanation, that the accident arose from want of care." See also Priggs v. Oliver, 4 Hurl. & Colt. 4°3; s- c-, 35 LJ (Exch.) 163. As was...

...The doctrine, as applied by the court there, is based upon reasoning like this : Where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant...use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care. For authorities...

...negligence." But he continues, "where the thing is solely under the management of the defendant and his servants, and the accident is such as, in the...use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendants, that the accident arose from want of care." Opinion in...

...defendant or his servants, and the casualty is such as in the ordinary course of tilings does not happen if those who have the management use proper care,...evidence, in the absence of explanation, that the casualty arose from want of care. Scott v. London tfe St. K. Docks Co. 3 Hurlst. & C. 596; Edgerton...