...reported, decided March 15, 1921) 196 Рас. 677, held as follows: '•When a given state of facts is such that reasonable men may fairly differ upon...the determination of the matter is for the Jury.» [3] The evidence is quite voluminous, but it will only be necessary to refer to a small portion of...

...reasonable men may fairly differ as to whether negligence is shown, the determination of such question is for the jury. It is only where the facts are such...that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusion frum them that the question of negligence is considered one of law for the court. St. I* & SV Ну....

...that can be drawn from the authorities to aid the defendant in this contention would be to say that it is only where the facts are such that all reasonable...men must draw the same conclusion from them that the drawing of the conclusion is ever considered as one of law for the court ; and, when a given state...

...524. [3, 4] Questions of negligence do not become questions of law to be decided by the court except where the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusion from them, and the case should not be withdrawn from, the jury unless the conclusion follows, as a matter of law,...

...case is one for the jury; and this is true also when the facts are not in dispute. It Is only when the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusión from them that the question of negligence becomes a question of law for the determination...

...shall constitute ordinary care -under any and all circumstances. * * * When a given state of facts is such that reasonable men may fairly differ upon...negligence or not, the determination of the matter la for the jury. It is only when the facts are such that reasonable men must draw the same conclusion...

...JUBT — CowTBIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE. The question of contributory negligence ia one of law for the court only where the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusion therefrom, and, where a doubt exists as to whether plaintiff's conduct under all the facts and circumstances...

...expected of reasonable, prudent men, under a similar state of affairs. When a given state of facts is such that reasonable men may fairly differ upon...that the question of negligence is ever considered at, one of law for the court." Grand Trunk Ry. Co. v. Ivés, 144 US 408, 417, 12 Sup. Ct. 670, 6S2,...

...appellee was puilty of contributory negligence in steppins off the platform. When a given state of facts is such that reasonable men may fairly differ upon...conclusion from them that the question of negligence is considered as one of law for the court; Railway Co. v. Ivés, 144 US 408, 12 Sup. Ct. 679; Gardner...

...of reasonably prudent men under a similar state of affairs. When a given state of facts is such as reasonable men may fairly differ upon the question...are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusions from them that the question of negligence is ever considered one of law for the court....