 It is not by the office of the person to whom the writ is directed, but the nature of the thing to be done, that the propriety or impropriety of issuing a mandamus is to be determined.  Hearings - Página 427por United States. Ad Hoc Advisory Group on the Presidential Vote for Puerto Rico - 1971 - 701 páginasVisualização integral - Acerca deste livro
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1910 - 710 páginas
...be such a case as would, were any other individual the party complained of, authorize the process T It is not by the office of the person to whom the...impropriety of issuing a mandamus is to be determined. Where the head of a department acts in a case, in which executive discretion is to be exercised ; in... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1965 - 182 páginas
...As Chief Justice Marshall said in Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 170, 6 US 137, 170, 2 L.Ed. 60 : "It is not by the office of the person to whom the...done, that the propriety or impropriety of issuing [an injunction] is to be determined." Interposition Except for an appropriation measure to provide... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1965 - 182 páginas
...As Chief Justice Marshall said in Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 170, 5 US 137, 170, 2 L.Ed. 60 : "It is not by the office of the person to whom the...done, that the propriety or impropriety of issuing [an injunction] is to be determined." Interposition Except for an appropriation measure to provide... | |
 | David Thomas Marvel, John W. Houston, Samuel Maxwell Harrington, James Pennewill, William Henry Boyce, William Watson Harrington, Charles L. Terry, William J. Storey - 1920 - 688 páginas
...departments of government, as well as the theory that they are independent of each other, yet it is not the office of the person to whom the writ is directed, but the nature of the thing to be done by which the propriety of issuing the writ is to be determined. Opinion. PENNEWILL, CJ, delivering... | |
 | 1918 - 356 páginas
...issuance of a writ of mandamus by a state court against the governor. It is to the following effect : "It is not by the office of the person to whom the...propriety or impropriety of issuing a mandamus is to 7State ex rel. Dulin v. Lehre, 7 Rich. (SC) 234 (1854); People ex rel. Robinson v. O'Keefe, too NY... | |
 | Philippines. Supreme Court - 1911 - 1012 páginas
...into its decision the words of Chief Justice Marshall in the case of Marbury vs. Madison as follows : "It is not by the office of the person to whom the...impropriety of issuing a mandamus is to be determined." These words of the great Chief Justice have frequently been cited by the courts and are considered... | |
 | David P. Currie - 1992 - 518 páginas
...that even a cabinet officer could be subjected to a court order in some cases, emphasizing that it was "not by the office of the person to whom the writ...nature of the thing to be done, that the propriety ... of issuing a mandamus is to be determined."85 But Marbury, as Chase insisted, had expressly been... | |
 | California. Supreme Court - 1906 - 786 páginas
...be such a case as would, were any other individual the party complained of, authorize the process?" "It is not by the office of the person to whom the writ is directed, tut the nature of the thing to le done, that the propriety or impropriety of issuing a mandamus is... | |
 | William Bondy - 1998 - 186 páginas
...frequently based upon a dictum of Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury vs. Madison,s to the effect that it is not by the office of the person to whom the writ is directed, but by the nature of the thing to be done, that the propriety or impropriety of issuing a mandamus is to... | |
 | Richard M Battistoni - 2000 - 198 páginas
...Bench has previously determined, or at least supposes, to be consonant to right and justice. . . . It is not by the office of the person to whom the...impropriety of issuing a mandamus is to be determined. Where the head of a department acts in a case in which Executive discretion is to be exercised, in... | |
| |
