...adverse possession. In Railway Co. v. McCarthy. 96 U. 8. 258, 267, 24 L. Ed. 693, the court held that: "Where a party gives a reason for his conduct and...litigation has begun, change his ground, and put his attack upon another and a different consideration. He Is not permitted thus to mend his hold. He is...

...if released from the debt on his lands. It has been held by several highly respectable courts that "where a party gives a reason for his conduct and...he cannot, after litigation has begun, change his grounds, and put his conduct upon another and different consideration. He is not permitted to change...

...that which he first adopts." In Railroad Co. v. McCarthy, 96 US 267, 24 L. ed. 696, the court said: "Where a party gives a reason for his conduct and...upon another and a different consideration. He is not thus permitted to amend his hold. He is estopped from doing it by a well-settled principle of law."...

...for the breach and say the law forbade the shipment on the Sabbath. The court, in the opinion, said : "Where a party gives a reason for his conduct and...change his ground and put his conduct upon another and different consideration. He is not permitted thus to mend his hold. He is estopped from doing it by...

...NW 574. The proposition is clearly expressed In Railroad Co. v. McCarthy, 96 US 258, 24 L. Ed. 693: "Where a party gives a reason for his conduct and...change his ground and put his conduct upon another and different consideration. He Is not permitted thus to mend his hold. He Is estopped from doing It by...

...forbade the shipment on the Sabbath. The court, in the opinion, said: "Where a party gives a reason ^or his conduct and decision touching anything involved...his .•ground and put his conduct upon another and different con.•sideration. He is not permitted thus to mend his hold. He is estopped from doing it...

...assert some other ground of defense. Donley v. Porter, 119 Iowa, 545; Hooves v. Suxmzey, 123 Iowa, 51. " Where a party gives a reason for his conduct and decision...anything involved in a controversy, he cannot, after litigatkm has begun, change his ground, and put his conduct upon another and different consideration."...

...Atlanta Trust & Bkg. Co. v. Close, 115 Ga. 939, 42 SE 265; Gavan v. Norcross, 117 Ga. 363, 43 SE 771. 'Where a party gives a reason for his conduct and...estopped from doing it by a settled principle of law." 2 Herman, Estoppel, p. 947. This doctrine is especially applicable in a case such as the present, where...

...amendment to the petition. This calls for the application of another rule. It !s this, when a party given a reason for his conduct and decision touching anything...controversy he cannot after litigation has begun, change hlg ground and put his conduct upon another and a different construction. He is not permitted to thus...

...decree." And the Supreme Court of the United States in Ohio & ME Co. v. McCarthy, 96 US 258, said: "Where a party gives a reason for his conduct and decision touching anything in a controversy, he cannot, after litigation has begun, change his ground, and put his conduct upon...