 There is no presumption in this country that every person knows the law; it would be contrary to common sense and reason, if it were so.  Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the Territory of Utah - Página 43por Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, George L. Nye, Joseph M. Tanner, John Walcott Thompson, Alonzo Blair Irvine, August B. Edler, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich, Harmel L. Pratt - 1910Visualização integral - Acerca deste livro
 | Francis Wharton - 1880 - 858 páginas
...in Martindale ». Falkner, 2 С. В. 719, Maule, J., correctly explains the rule of law. He says: ' There is no presumption in this country that every...contrary to common sense and reason if it were so.' In Jones v. Randall, Cowp. 38, 40, Dunning, arguendo, says: ' The laws of this country are clear, evident,... | |
 | Franklin Fiske Heard - 1881 - 212 páginas
...arising from a presumption that every person knows the law. Mr. Justice Maule once observed that " There is no presumption in this country that every...contrary to common sense and reason if it were so." Martindale v. Falkner, 2 CB 720. This language was characterized by Mr. Justice Blackburn as clear,... | |
 | 1909 - 1164 páginas
...money to know what It Is, even in the last resort." Said Mr. Justice Maule, in Martindale v. Felkuer, 2 CB 719: "There Is no presumption in this country...Supreme Court (Black v. Ward, 27 Mich. 191, 15 Am. Rep. 162) observed: "But the maxim referred to in regard to a knowledge of the law is misapplied. No... | |
 | William Albert Keener - 1888 - 1234 páginas
...would think that a reference to adjudged cases could not be necessary to establish a principle of 1 There is no presumption in this country that every person knows the law ; it would he contrary to common sense and reason if it were so. ... The rnle is that ignorance of law shall not... | |
 | William Albert Keener - 1893 - 508 páginas
...think in Martindale v. Falkner (2 GB 719), Maule, J., correctly explained the rule of law. He says: 'There is no presumption in this country that every...knows the law. It would be contrary to common sense. In Jones v. Randell (Cow. 38-40), Dunning, arguendo, says: "Laws of this character are clearly evident... | |
 | Sir Edward Loughlin O'Malley - 1893 - 916 páginas
...approval the judgment of Mr. Justice Maule, where the latter, a great common-sense intellect, says: " There is no presumption in this country that every person knows the law, and it would be contrary to common sense and reason if it were so." In that case, which related to... | |
 | John Pitt Taylor - 1897 - 840 páginas
...to be opposed to such a rule. "There is no presumption in this country," says Mr. Justice Maule, " that every person knows the law ; it would be contrary to common sense and reason, if it were so." Martindale v. Falkner, 2 CB 706, 719 (1840). So Lord Mansfield, in Jones v. Randall, 1 Cowper, 37 (1774),... | |
 | James Bradley Thayer - 1898 - 680 páginas
...probetur in contrarium. Bracton, fol. 193. 2 " There is no presujuption in this country that everybody knows the law; it would be contrary to common sense and reason if it were so." Maule, J., in Martindale p. Falkner, 2 CB 719. See Lord Esher, in Blackburn r. Vigors, 17 QBD 553,... | |
 | John Davison Lawson - 1899 - 820 páginas
...bound to know it. The bill * * * presupposes the client to possess a considerable knowledge of the law. There is no presumption in this country that every person knows the law ; it would be contrarv to common sense and reason if it were so." "Every elector," said Blackburn, J., in case IX.... | |
 | 1900 - 330 páginas
...felony could not be compounded. But the court, quoting the words of Maule, J., in Martindale v. Falkner, "There is no presumption in this country that every...contrary to common sense and reason if it were so," held that (he maxim cannot at any rate be a defense to criminal liability. It is to be noticed in this... | |
| |
