...a statute is that stated by the court in the case of United States v. Heth (3 Cranch, 398). It is: Words in a statute ought not to have a retrospective...or unless the intention of the legislature cannot be otherwise satisfied. Passing by, therefore, without deciding, the question as to whether a foreign...

...a statute is that stated by the court in the case of United States r. Heth (3 Cranch, 398). It is: Words in a statute ought not to have a retrospective...to them, or unless the intention of the legislature can not be otherwise satisfied. Passing by, therefore, without deciding, the question as to whether...

...treatment of legislation. S. Statutes -2=263 Statutes are not to be applied retroactively unless words used are so clear, strong and imperative that no other...can be annexed to them or unless the intention of legislature cannot be otherwise satisfied. 4. Statutes «=2«3 Retrospective operation will not be...

...treatment of legislation. 3. Statutes 0=263 Statutes are not to be applied retroactively unless words used are so clear, strong and imperative that no other...can be annexed to them or unless the intention of legislature cannot be otherwise satisfied. 4. Statute* C=>2«3 Retrospective operation will not be...

...many court opinions which state that statutes are not to be applied retroactively unless words used are so clear, strong and imperative that no other meaning can be annexed to them. 12/ However, the above argument ie designed to ehow that the Section 7(b)(5) legislation con be interpreted...

...intent on the part of the legislature to make such statute retroactive. It has been said that words of a statute ought not to have a retrospective operation...or unless the intention of the legislature cannot be otherwise satisfied. * * * Some courts take the view that since limitation laws apply only to the...

...to impo* retroactive deductions. Statutes are not to be applied retroactively "unless the words used are so clear, strong and imperative that no other...or unless the intention of the legislature cannot, be otherwise satisfied." United States F & G Co. v. United States for the Vie and Benefit of Struthers...

...statutory construction that statutes should be construed to prevent them from operating retroactively; Words in a statute ought not to have a retrospective...or unless the intention of the legislature cannot be otherwise satisfied. This rule ought especially to be adhered to, when such a construction will...

...retroactive application if the statutory language "Is susceotible of any other" meaning and "unless the words are so clear, strong and imperative that no other meaning can be annexed to them". LEXIS p. *15. The court contrasted the language of sec. 402(a) with that of sec. 14 of the 1972 amendments...

...retroactive application if the statutory language "is susceotible of any other" meaning and "unless the words are so clear, strong and imperative that no other meaning can be annexed to them". LEXIS p. *15. The court contrasted the language of sec. 402 (a) with that of sec. 14 of the 1972 amendments...