...and disagreeable. Moreover, as Justice Robert Jackson eloquently stated over 50 years ago, "Freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter...things that touch the heart of the existing order." America is a strong enough country to tolerate political demonstrations — even extreme and offensive...

...Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 US 624, 642 (1943), a flag salute case: [F]reedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter...things that touch the heart of the existing order. If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty,...

...Jackson's works in West Virginia State Board of Education, v. Barnette, a flag salute case: "[Flreedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter...things that touch the heart of the existing order." Some advocates of this amendment reason that it does not unconstitutionally infringe on free speech...

...and pledge allegiance to the American flag. "Freedom to differ," Justice Jackson wrote for the Court, "is not limited to things that do not matter much....things that touch the heart of the existing order." Justice Jackson memorably continued; "If there be any fixed star in our constitutional constellation,...

...and disagreeable. Moreover, as Justice Robert Jackson eloquently stated over 50 years ago, "Freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would oe a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch...

...290 Id. Justice Blackraun's dissent reiterates this when he quotes West Virginia Board of Education: "'[fjreedom to differ is not limited to things that...things that touch the heart of the existing order.'" Bowers, 478 US at 211 (Blackmun, J., dissenting) (quoting West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette,...

...as this one, the patient may die as a result of refusing the recommended treatment. "... But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter...things that touch the heart of the existing order. If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty,...

...of their particular point of view. As noted by the US Supreme Court in Street v. New York, freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much or to those things upon which we agree. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of the first...

...Selectwe Conscientious Objector: The Right Not to Kill, 44 NYUL REv. 875, 891 (1969l. 47. "Freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much— . The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing...

...things upon which we agree. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of the first amendment's substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the very heart of the existing order. And as noted by the Supreme Court in the landmark case Texas v. Johnson,...