| 1926 - 496 páginas
...Defendants. lobst, J., October 6, 1924. On September 10, 1924, on motion of defendants, the Court awarded a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and they let into a defense. In response to the rule, the use plaintiff filed an answer asking for the... | |
| Randolph Stauffer, Wellington M. Bertolet - 1911 - 522 páginas
...aforesaid execution. That on August 27, 1909, upon petition of the defendant, a rule was granted to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and the defendant let into a defense, the lien of the levy in the meantime to remain. The court filed an opinion on July 5, 1910,... | |
| 1911 - 252 páginas
...judgment note to No. 30, August Term, 1909. Upon the petition of the defendant a rule was granted to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and the defendant let into a defense, the execution to be stayed in the meantime. This rule was discharged on July 5, 1910. On September... | |
| Charles K. Morganroth - 1918 - 452 páginas
...function it is to find the true facts where the testimony is contradictory. And now, November 6, 1918, the rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and the defendant let into a defense is made absolute, and an exception is noted and bill sealed for the plaintiff in the judgment.... | |
| Randolph Stauffer, Wellington M. Bertolet - 1913 - 774 páginas
...In the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County. No. 77 October Term, 1912, JD Rule to show cause why judgment should not be opened and the defendant let into a defence. John K. Hahn for defendant and rule. J. Milton Miller contra. Opinion by Wagner, J., May 24, 1913.... | |
| Charles K. Morganroth - 1920 - 472 páginas
...upon the plaintiff to show cause why the judgment should not be stricken from the record or why said judgment should not be opened and the defendant let into a defence. November 9, 1914, the plaintiff in the judgment and respondent in the rule filed his answer in which... | |
| Charles K. Morganroth - 1915 - 486 páginas
...opportunity to present his defense before a jury of his peers. And now, to wit, August 25th, 1913, the rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and the defendant let into a defense is hereby made obsolute. BITTINGER v. BOROUGH OF SHAMOKIN. Pleading — Amendment — Adding... | |
| 1917 - 456 páginas
...time that has elapsed, we do not feel that we should disturb this judgment. And Now, July 23rd., 1917, the rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and the defendant let into a defense is herewith discharged. Ratzburg vs. Olszewski Scire Facias — Mechanic's Lien — Vacating... | |
| 1917 - 584 páginas
...J., December , 1915. — On December 19, 1914, a rule was granted in the above entitled case to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and the defendant let into a defense, on the ground that no written notice was actually given of the filing of the statement, nor... | |
| Charles K. Morganroth - 1917 - 490 páginas
...person the word "ball" Is written, judgment was illegally and improperly entered against him. and a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and the person signing as ball let into a defense was made absolute. A person is not bound prima facie by his... | |
| |