...would annul valid contractual obligations of the United States. In the words of the Supreme Court : "The United States are as much bound by their contracts...had been a State or a municipality or a citizen." Sinking Fund Cases 99 US 496 (1878), It would thus seem a serious reflection upon the integrity of...

...•would annul valid contractual obligations of the United States. In the words of the Supreme Court: "The United States are as much bound by their contracts...had been a State or a municipality or a citizen." Sinking Fund Cases 99 US 496 (1878) It would thus seem a serious reflection upon the integrity of the...

...contracts as are iodiriduK If they repudiate their obligations, it is as much repudiation as it would I* if the repudiator had been a State, or a municipality, or a citizen. Section 309 — Unauthorized Use: Allows the Secretary of Interior unlimited authority to decide the...

...UNCONSTITUTIONAL WHEN APPLIED TO ALTER THE GOVERNMENT'S COMMITMENTS). IT HAS LONG BEEN FUNDAMENTAL THAT "THE UNITED STATES ARE AS MUCH BOUND BY THEIR CONTRACTS AS ARE INDIVIDUALS." UNION PAC. VRR STATES , 99 US 700, 719 (1879). R. UNITED APPLYING THESE PRINCIPLES TO TEXACO, THE FOLLOWING...

...Court, stating its position on the obligatory character of the contracts of the United States, said, "'The United States are as much bound by their contracts...repudiator had been a State or a municipality or a citizen.1" Perry v. United States. 294 US 330, 79 L. Ed. 912 (1934) (citing the Sinking Fund Cases....

...are governed generally by the law applicable to contracts between private individuals. . . . i * • "The United States are as much bound by their contracts as are Individuals. . . ." Lynch v. United States, supra. 292 US at 579-80 , quoting Sinking Fund Cases. 99 US 700, 719...

...was not new law. As far back as the Sinking Fund case in 1878', the Court emphatically stated that, "The United States are as much bound by their contracts...had been a state or a municipality or a citizen." Other cases cited by those wanting to prohibit prepayment are equally out of place. Gillanders v. Smith...

...was not new law. As far back as the Sinking Fund case in 1878', the Court emphatically stated that, "The United States are as much bound by their contracts...reproach that term implies, as it would be if the repudlator had been a state or a municipality or a citizen." Other cases cited by those wanting to...

...generally by the law applicable to contracts between private individuals. . . . • *•*••• "The United States are as much bound by their contracts as are individuals. . . . Lynch v. United States, supra, 292 US at 579-80, quoting Sinking Fund Cases, 99 US 700, 719 (1879)...

...to the terms of the contract already made in that connection. The United States are aa much bound bv their contracts as are individuals. If they repudiate...with all the wrong and reproach that term implies, aa it would be if the reoudiator had baan a State or a municipality or a citizen. No change can be...