 | Sir Fortunatus Dwarris - 1885 - 698 páginas
...beginning with maxims of justice and equity." 1. " The first general maxim of interpretation is, that it is not permitted to interpret what has no need of interpretation. When an act is conceived in clear and precise terms ; when the sense is manifest, and leads to nothing absurd ; there... | |
 | United States. Department of State - 1885 - 632 páginas
...language conferring jurisdiction upon this Commission. The first general maxim of interpretation is that it is not permitted to interpret what has no need of interpretation. (Vattel, book 2, chap. 17, sec. 203.) When the act or treaty is conceived in clear and precise terms;... | |
 | United States. Congress. House - 1885 - 654 páginas
...language conferring jurisdiction upon this Commission. The first general maxim of interpretation is that it is not permitted to interpret what has no need of interpretation. (Vattel, book 2, chap. 17, sec. 203.) When the act or treaty is conceived in clear and precise terms;... | |
 | United States. Congress. House - 1212 páginas
...approved writer upon the law of nations, before, noticed, proposes, as the first general maxim, " that it is not permitted to interpret what has no need of interpretation. When an act is conceived in clear and precise terms, when the sense is manifest, and leads to nothing absurd, there... | |
 | 1917 - 1154 páginas
...326. In Jackson v. Lewis, 17 Johns. 475, the court laid down the rule that when an act is conceived in clear and precise terms, when the sense is manifest and leads to no absurdity, there can be no reason to refuse the sense which it naturally presents. To go elsewhere... | |
 | 1920 - 1116 páginas
...he gives for the iuterpretafion of treaties: 'It is not permitted,' he says (B. 2, c. 17, S. 263), 'to interpret what has no need of interpretation. When an act is conceived in clear and precise terms, when the sense is manifest and leads to nothing absurd, there... | |
 | Hawaii. Supreme Court - 1890 - 844 páginas
...not he the right one." Per Parke, J. in Reg. vs. Irihdb. of Banbury, 1 A. & E. 142. Where a statute is expressed in clear and precise terms, when the...and leads to nothing absurd, there can be no reason to refuse the sense which it naturally presents. Jackson vs. Lewis, 17 Johns., 475; People vs. NY Cen.... | |
 | Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1890 - 1142 páginas
...Opinion. 458 PEYTON AND AL. V. CARR'S Opinion. a fundamental and essential rule of construction is that it is not permitted to interpret what has no need of interpretation. When an act is conceived in clear and precise terms ; when the sense is manifest, and leads to nothing absurd, there... | |
 | Illinois. Appellate Court, James Bolesworth Bradwell - 1892 - 732 páginas
...Court. There seems to be no room for construction. Indeed, it is a rule applicable here, that " lt is not permitted to interpret what has no need of interpretation. When an act is expressed in clear terms, when the same is manifest and leads to nothing absurd, there is no reason not to adopt the sense... | |
 | William Weeks Morrill - 1895 - 952 páginas
...or not, according to the structures erected by it. In the construction of statutes it is said that it is not permitted to interpret what has no need of interpretation. When it is expressed in clear and precise terms — when the sense is manifest, and leads to nothing absurd... | |
| |
The first general maxim of interpretation is, that it is not permitted to interpret what has no need of interpretation. When an act is conceived in clear and precise terms, when the sense is manifest, and leads to nothing absurd, there can be no reason... 
