...rules 15 and 18 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which establish liberal rules for the joiner of causes of action. But these rules do not dispense...be construed to extend or limit the jurisdiction of tbe district courts of the United States or the venue of actions therein. Because causes of action...

...construction given to Rule 4 (f ) by the court below is inconsistent with Rule 82 which provides that the rules "shall not be construed to extend or limit the...the United States or the venue of actions therein." The answer to the suggestion that the consent to suit in the state is a consent to suit only in the...

...District of Columbia in Title 28, USC, §§ 132 (a), 88. Rule 82. Jurisdiction and Venue Unaffected. These rules shall not be construed to extend or limit the jurisdiction of the diotrict courts el tke United Stated United States district courts or the venue of actions therein....

...state and the state judicial decisions construing them. RULE 82. JURISDICTION AND VENUE UNAFFECTED. These rules shall not be construed to extend or limit the jurisdiction of the United States district courts or the venue of actions therein. RULE 86. EFFECTIVE DATE. (c) EFFECTIVE...

...eff. Mar. 19, 1948 ; Dec. 29, 1948, eff. Oct. 20, 1949.) Rule 82. Jurisdiction and Venue Unaffected. These rules shall not be construed to extend or limit the jurisdiction of the United States district courts or the venue of actions therein. (As amended Dec. 29, 1948, eff. Oct....

...eff. Mar. 19, 1948 ; Dec. 29, 1948, eff. Oct. 20, 1949.) Rule 82. Jurisdiction and Venue Unaffected. These rules shall not be construed to extend or limit the jurisdiction of the United States district courts or the venue of actions therein. (As amended Dec. 29, 1948, eff. Oct....

...change in the definition of "matter in controversy" would clearly conflict with the command of Rule 82 that "[t]hese rules shall not be construed to extend or limit the jurisdiction of the United States district courts . . . ." In Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., this Court held that the rule-making...

...change in the definition of "matter in controversy" would clearly conflict with the command of Rule 82 that "These rules shall not be construed to extend or limit the jurisdiction of the United States district courts. . . ." In Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., this Court held that the rule-making...

...1971, eff. July 1, 1971; Mar. 2, 1987, eff. Aug. 1, 1987.) Rule 82. Jurisdiction and Venue Unaffected These rules shall not be construed to extend or limit the jurisdiction of the United States district courts or the venue of actions therein. An admiralty or maritime claim within...

...shall be in accordance with the practice of the district court (b) Rules Not to Affect Jurisdiction.- These rules shall not be construed to extend or limit the jurisdiction of the courts of appeals as established by law. (c) Title.-- These rules may be known and cited as the Federal...