...any subsequent action, "it ia a finality as to the claim or demand in controversy, concluding parties not only as to every matter which was offered and...matter which might have been offered for that purpose." Thus for example, a judgment rendered upon a promissory note is conclusive as to the validity of the...

...concluding parties and those in privity with them, not only as to. every matter which was offered or received to sustain or defeat the claim or demand,...matter which might have been offered for that purpose." And as stated in Burlen v. Shannon, 99 Mass. 200, 203: -'The estoppel is not confined to the judgment,...

...absolute bar to a subsequent action. It is a finality as to the claim or demand in controversy, concluding parties, and those in privity with them, not only...matter which might have been offered for that purpose. But where the second action between the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the judgment...

...interest." It was held, however, that the judgment of foreclosure was a judgment on the merits, and concluded the parties and those in privity with them,...matter which might have been offered for that purpose. Citing Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 US 351, 352, 24 L. Ed. 195. It was accordingly further held that...

...that case the court says: '•It Is a finality as to the claim or demand in controversy, concluding parties, and those in privity with them, not only...matter which might have been offered for that purpose. Thus, for example, a Judgment rendered upon a promissory note is conclusive as to the validity of the...

...absolute bar to a subsequent action. It is a finality as to the claim or demand in controversy, concluding parties and those in privity with them, not only as...matter which might have been offered for that purpose. • • • " 'But where the second action between the same parties is upon a different claim or demand,...

...same cause of action between the same parties or their privies, the first Judgment Is an absolute bar, not only as to every matter which was offered and...matter which might have been offered for that purpose. When the second action is between the same parties, but upon a different claim or demand, the Judgment...

...an estoppel in another action between the same parties upon the same claim or demand, is conclusive, not only as to every matter which was offered and...admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose.3 When used as an estoppel in an action on another claim or demand, it is conclusive on any...

...offered and received to sustain or defeat the respective claims of the parties to the fund, but also as to any other admissible matter which might have been offered for that purpose." The decree of the circuit court is affirmed, with costs. i For collusiveness of judgments as between...

...to the end. The two suits related to the same subject-matter, and were in fact pending at the same time in two courts of concurrent jurisdiction. The...352. It is true the mortgagor did not set up as a defence that the bank had no right to take the mortgage, or that he was entitled to certain credits...