 The general rule is, that the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved.  United States Reports: Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court - Página 426por United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1889Visualização integral - Acerca deste livro
 | 1923 - 920 páginas
...answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course 1 H. & cp 543. of the service and for the master's benefit, though...express command or privity of the master be proved." But after giving instances of the application of this rule, Willes adds: "In all these cases it may... | |
 | Richard Ringwood - 1924 - 422 páginas
...the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though...express command or privity of the master be proved. The principle is acted upon every day in running-down cases. It has been applied also to direct trespasses... | |
 | 1899 - 1098 páginas
...the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though...express command or privity of the master be proved." In such cases as those which Willes, J., gives as analogous illustrations, it would be no answer to... | |
 | 1924 - 792 páginas
...same source, at least show how easily translatable the older test is to the newer. " In the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though...express command or privity of the master be proved." Willes, J., for the Court in Barwick v. Bank, LR 2 Ex. 259 (1867). " It is true he has not authorized... | |
 | Edwin Roulette Keedy - 1924 - 862 páginas
...the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though...express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle is acted upon every day in running down cases. It has been applied also to direct trespass... | |
 | John Arthur Slater - 1924 - 640 páginas
...the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though...express command or privity of the master be proved. That principle is acted upon every day in running-down coses. It has been applied also to direct trespass... | |
 | 1913 - 1066 páginas
...such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the mister's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved.' The rule thus expressed has since been repeatedly approved and adopted in the House of Lords, the Privy... | |
 | Floyd Russell Mechem - 1925 - 904 páginas
...the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though...express command or privity of the master be proved." To that statement of the law no objection of any sort can be taken. But it is a very different proposition... | |
 | Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1922 - 856 páginas
...master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent as is committed in the course of his service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master be proved." It follows that it is right and proper to require the Seaboard to pay the plaintiff the $700, with... | |
 | 1927 - 1624 páginas
...that the master is answerable for every such wrong of the servant or agent committed in the course of the service and for the master's benefit, though no express command or privity of the master is proved ; that, while it is true the master has not authorized the particular act, yet he has put... | |
| |
