If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve this Union or to change its republican form, let them stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it. Eloquence of the United States - Página 801827Visualização integral - Acerca deste livro
| Joseph A. Murray - 2007 - 266 páginas
...345 reunify the country that had been polarized by the struggle to elect its Chief Executive, We have called by different names brethren of the same principle....opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it.15 To disclose the foreign policy he intended to pursue, he said, "honest friendship with... | |
| George Anastaplo - 2007 - 346 páginas
...proclamation, "We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists." This is followed by his Miltonian sentiment, "If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve...undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinions may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it." This is, in effect, a sequel for... | |
| Edward J. Larson - 2007 - 349 páginas
...are all Federalists. If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve this Union, or to challenge its republican form, let them stand undisturbed as...opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free." He then restated his political principles in centrist terms: neutrality abroad, the freedom of religion... | |
| Edward J. Larson - 2007 - 355 páginas
...difference of principle," Jefferson cautioned in a statement calculated to reach out to moderates. "We are all Republicans: We are all Federalists. If...among us who would wish to dissolve this Union, or to challenge its republican form, let them stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error... | |
| Rosemarie Zagarri - 2007 - 258 páginas
...conciliation, famously stating, "Every difference of opinion is not a difference of principle. We have called by different names brethren of the same principle. We are all republicans; we are all federalists." However, as various historians have noted, Jefferson did not intend to suggest that Federalist views... | |
| Michael Warren - 2007 - 235 páginas
...partisan election in 1800, "every difference of opinion is not a difference of principle. We have been called by different names brethren of the same principle. We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists." We should not expect that simply by examining issues in light of the First Principles and our history... | |
| Matthew S. Holland - 2007 - 340 páginas
...in the second paragraph, "But every difference of opinion is not a difference of principle. We have called by different names brethren of the same principle. We are all republicans: we are all federalists." Ellis among others downplays the conciliatory significance of this statement by stressing that Jefferson... | |
| Brent Gilchrist - 2006 - 322 páginas
...political debate: "Every difference of opinion is not a difference of principle," he maintained. "We have called by different names brethren of the same principle. We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists."222 It has been demonstrated that this was not merely a rhetorical unification as is customary... | |
| Marc Karnis Landy, Sidney M. Milkis - 2008 - 41 páginas
...political moderation: "every difference of opinion is not a difference of principle. . . . We have all called by different names brethren of the same principle....We are all republicans - we are all federalists." The demise of the Federalists ushered in the so-called Era of Good Feelings and appeared to restore... | |
| Leroy G. Dorsey - 2008 - 284 páginas
...he made it so. "Every difference of opinion," he insisted, "is not a division of principle. We have called by different names brethren of the same principle. We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists."15 The clearly implicit message is that the election season was over and that it was time... | |
| |