...act as public convenience, interest, or necessity require, does not confer an unlimited power, but is to be interpreted by its context, by the nature...the public through the distribution of facilities. Yankee Network v. Federal Communications Commission, 1939, 107 F.2d 212, 71 App.DC 11. The policy of...

...objectionable as conferring indefinite and unlimited power, but is denned by the context and subject matter, and, where an equitable adjustment between States...the public through the distribution of facilities. P. 285! 16. In making " fair and equitable allocation," the equities of existing stations must be considered;...

...objectionable as conferring indefinite and unlimited power, but is denned by the context and subject matter, and, where an equitable adjustment between States...the public through the distribution of facilities. P. 285. 16. In making " fair and equitable allocation," the equities of existing stations must be considered;...

...not to be interpreted as setting up a standard so indefinite as to confer an unlimited power. * * * The requirement is to be interpreted by its context,...by the scope, character, and quality of services. * * *" Part of the context is section 1 of the Communications Act, which states that the Commission...

...Pottsville Broadcasting Co., 309 US 134, 138. These factors are diverse and they change * so that " 'The requirement is to be interpreted by its context' " — by the nature of the business regulated, by the " 'scope, character and quality of services," " to mention only some...

..."public interest, convenience, or necessity." The standard of public interest is given significance "by its context, by the nature of radio transmission...the scope, character, and quality of services," and by the general objectives of the statute.1 As thus construed by the Supreme Court, the term "public...

...Central Securities Co. v. United States (287 US 12, 24). The requirement is to be interpreted by Us context, by the nature of radio transmission and reception,...service which will be enjoyed by the public through (he distribution of facilitiesIn making such an adjustment the equities of existing stations undoubtedly...

...confer an unlimited power. Compare JVni; Yoik Central Kcturities Co. v. United States. 287 US 12, 24. The requirement is to be interpreted by its context,...reception, by the scope, character and quality of services . . ." Federal Radio Comm'n v. Nrl*on Hrox. Co., 289 US 26:i, 285. The "public Interest" to be served...

...confer an unlimited power. Compare New York Central Securities Co. v. United States, 287 US 12, 24. The requirement is to be interpreted by its context,...reception, by the scope, character and quality of services . . ." Federal Radio Comm'n v. Nelson Bros. Co., 289 US 266, 285. The "public interest" to be served...

...confer an unlimited power. Compare New York Central Securities Co. v. United States, 287 US 12, 24. The requirement is to be interpreted by its context,...reception, by the scope, character and quality of services . . ." Federal Radio Comm'n v. Nelson Bros. Co., 289 US 266, 285. The "public interest" to be served...