...having found that the respondents. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines. Inc., and Greyhound Management Co., had interfered with, restrained, and coerced their employees...of the rights guaranteed in section 7 of the act, ordered the respondents, their officers and agents to — cease and desist from in any manner interfering...

...the plants. ******* We find that by all these acts the respondents have interfered with, ressrrained, and coerced their employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in Section 7 of the act. In Matter of Nebel Knitting Company, Inc.,31 the president, at a company Christmas party, told the...

...dominated throughout its history, and to whose financial support they had contributed; and that they had interfered with, restrained and coerced their employees in the exercise of the rights confirmed by § 7 to form for themselves a labor organization and to bargain collectively through representatives...

...reasoning the Board stated its formal conclusion of law that by interfering with, restraining and coercing their employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act, the respondents engaged in unfair labor practices within the meaning of Section 8(1) of the Act. We...

...in respect to rates of pay, wages, hours of employment and other conditions of employment and have thereby interfered with, restrained, and coerced their employees In the exercise of the rights guaranteed by Section 7 of the Act, and that these respondents and also the respondents Holden and...

...other meetings as detailed above, and by the unilateral wage increases, the respondent dealers have interfered with, restrained, and coerced their employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed by Section 7 of the Act. " The findings regarding the meetings and communications between...

...the election period, contributed financial and other support to the AWA in violation of Section 8 (2) of the Act and thereby interfered with, restrained, and coerced their employees in violation of Section 8 (1) of the Act. D. Pant-flection interference, coercion, restraint; interference...

...thus denying the use of the hall to the Union, the respondents Stowe, Acme, Perfection, and Linford interfered with, restrained, and coerced their employees...of the rights guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act, in violation of Section 8(1) thereof." Id., 624. REED, J., dissenting. 336 US pressions, set out below,3...

...violated § 7 and concluded as a matter of law : "3. By interfering with, restraining, and coercing their employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act, the respondents Stowe Spinning Company, Acme Spinning Company, Perfection Spinning Company, and Linford...

...violated § 7 and concluded as a matter of law: "3. By interfering with, restraining, and coercing their employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act, the respondents Stowe Spinning Company, Acme Spinning Company, Perfection Spinning Company, and Linford...