...this change he was entitled to be informed. A party has a right to select and determine the person with whom he will contract, and cannot have another person thrust upon him without his consent." " As he may contract with whom he pleases, the sufficiency of his reasons for so doing cannot be inquired...

...Citizens' Ice Company. Of this change he was entitled to be informed. Boston Ice Company v. Potter. A party has a right to select and determine with whom he will...another person thrust upon him without his consent. It may be of importance to him who performs the contract, as when he contracts with another to paint...

...shall not be assignable. "But every one has a right to select and determine wilh whom he will eontract, and cannot have another person thrust upon him Without his consent In the familiar phrase of Lord Dennian, 'You have the right to the braelit you anticipate from the character, credit, and substance...

...this change he was entitled to be informed. A party has a right to select and determine the person with whom he will contract, and cannot have another person thrust upon him without his consent. As he may contract with whom he pleases, the sufficiency of his reasons for so doing cannot be inquired...

...assignees can succeed to any rights In virtue of It or be bound by Its obligations, or that a party has a right to select and determine with whom he •will...another person thrust upon him without his consent. But these principles, and authorities cited to sustain them, are not In point as we view this contract....

...some other stipulation, which manifests the Intention of the parties that it shall not be assignable. But every one has a right to select and determine...thrust upon him without his consent. In the familiar pbrase of Lord Denman: 'You have the right to the benefit you anticipate from the character, crédit,...

...Boston Ice Co. v. Potter, 123 Mass. 28, 25 Am. Rep. 9, the Supreme Court of Massachusetts said: "A party has a right to select and determine with whom he will...another person thrust upon him without his consent." Again, in Winchester v. Howard, 97 Mass. 303, 93 Am. Dec. 93, it was said: "It is true that an ngent...

...he is not obliged to accept a deed from the principal, when discovered, though he may do so. A party has a right to select and determine with whom he will...cannot have another person thrust upon him without hia consent. [Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Principal and Agent, Cent Dig. §§ 602-512; Dec....

...Potter, 123 Mass. 28, 25 Am. Rep. 9, that "a party пая a right to select and determine with whom be will contract, and cannot have another person thrust upon him without his consent"; but the application of the rule in that case to a defendant who had received and used ice furnished...

...in whom he actually confided, are not transferable." 4 Cyc. 22; 2 Am. & Eng. Ency. L. (2d Ed.) 1018. "Every one has a right to select and determine with...consent. In the familiar phrase of Lord Denman, 'You have a right to the benefit you anticipate from the character, credit and substance of the party with whom...