etude in Europe, creating a wide-spread willingness and desire to sacrifice native-born comforts and innumerable precious ties, for “a lodge in some vast wilderness," remote though it were, but beaming with the charms of distance as the abode of freedom. Though political designs, commercial enterprise, and speculation, had their share of influence in the settlement of this continent, it is unnecessary to say, that the ruling passion of European emigration this way, for ages, was an indomitable aspiration after freedom-a freedom which could not be enjoyed in the old world; and it is equally true, as all know, that the same feelings still continue to prompt this great movement from East to West. Westward the star of empire moves; but it is all for freedom. It is to purchase, to secure, and to protect the rights of man-the very rights which have been under consideration in the preceding chapter. It is to be relieved from that incubus of European despotism, which robs man of the reward of his exertions, and to enjoy that reward. But unfortunately for freedom. that same watchful power, the cruelties of which had forced this great movement, guided and prompted by the instincts of its own voracious and insatiable appetite for oppression and wrong, followed its victims in the pathway of their escape, and spread, and continued to hold, over them, the claims of its unjust pretensions. It is enough for our purpose here, to abridge this great chapter of American history, and point only to that of the North American colonies, till it ended in the establishment of American independence. The whole of that history was a struggle for freedom, without gaining it; for it will be found, that the commercial troubles of the confederated states, till the adoption of the constitution in 1789, were greater than they had ever been, and that the independence acquired was merely nominal—all and solely for want of a protective system, which, under such a rope of sand as the articles of confederation, could not be put in force. The evils of this specific character-there were no other-were seen, felt, and deplored; the states, in their isolated positions, tried to protect themselves, and only made the matter worse, aggravated the difficulties, by interferences; till at last, the states being on the verge of dissolution, as an independent nation, on account of this great defect, the federal constitution was adopted as a remedy. The history of those times shows, that the grand object, the impelling necessity, of the formation of the federal government, in 1789, was to obtain a power for the protection of the commercial rights of the nation and of the people; and in accordance with this de sign, the earliest action of the new government, was on the question of forming and establishing a protective system. The bill, or act, which was the great object of the federal constitution, on motion of Mr. Madison, the father of that instrument, was brought forward, with the least possible delay, under the following preamble: "Whereas, it is necessary for the support of government, for the discharge of the debts of the United States, and for the encouragement and PROTECTION of manufactures, that duties be laid on goods, wares, and merchandise, imported— Be it enacted," &c.; and after having been passed, was signed by President Washington, the Fourth of July, 1789-a signal coincidence, as being the birthday of American freedom, not an accident, manifestly, but expressly designed, no doubt, as a profound and emphatic historical expression of the president's and of the public sense of the affinity and identical purpose of these two great events, and that the first could not be complete, nor consummated, without the second. The same necessity which begat the revolution, was the parent of the federal constitution, and of this law-this law, or its policy, established and secured, being the end of all. A few extracts from presidential messages and other documents, from Washington's administration down to the time when this policy was doomed to encounter an unnatural and suicidal opposition, will exhibit the prominency which this great principle has held in the counsels and legislation of the government, during the progress of our history.* * From Washington's Messages to Congress. "The advancement of agriculture, commerce, and manufactures, by all proper means, will not, I trust, need recommendation; but I can not forbear intimating to you the expediency of giving effectual encouragement, as well to the introduction of new and useful inventions from abroad, as to the exertions of skill and genius in producing them at home." "Congress has repeatedly, and not without success, directed their attention to the encouragement of manufactures. The object is of too much consequence not to insure a continuance of their efforts in every way which shall appear eligible." From Jefferson's Messages. "To cultivate peace, and maintain commerce and navigation, in all their lawful enterprises; to foster our fisheries, as nurseries of navigation and for the nurture of man, and to protect the manufactures adapted to our circumstances — these, fellow-citizens, are the landmarks by which we are to guide ourselves in all our proeeedings."-Second Annual Message. "The situation into which we have been forced, has impelled us to apply a portion of our industry and capital to national manufactures and improvements. The extent of conversion is daily increasing, and little doubt remains, that the establishments formed and forming will, under the auspices of cheaper materials and These extracts, in the note below, from state-papers and other documents, might be greatly extended, if it were necessary, to show, subsistence, the freedom of labor from taxation with us, and of protecting duties and prohibitions, become permanent."-Eighth Annual Message. From Jefferson's Letter to Benjamin Austin, 1816. "We have experienced what we did not then believe, that there exist both profligacy and power enough to exclude us from the field of interchanges with other nations; that to be independent for the comforts of life, we must fabricate them ourselves. We must now place our manufacturers by the side of the agriculturist. The former question is now suppressed, or rather assumes a new form. The grand inquiry now is, shall we make our own comforts, or go without them at the will of a foreign nation. He, therefore, who is now against domestic manufactures, must be for reducing us either to a dependence upon that nation, or be clothed in skins, and live like beasts in dens and caverns. I am proud to say, that I am not one of these. Experience has taught me, that manufactures are now as necessary to our independence as to our comfort." From Madison's Messages. "The revision of our commercial laws, proper to adapt them to the arrangement which has taken place with Great Britain, will doubtless engage the early attention of Congress. It will be worthy at the same time of their just and provident care, to make such further alterations in the laws as will more especially protect and foster the several brunches of manufacture which have been recently instituted or extended by the laudable exertion of our citizens."-1809. "I recommend also, as a more effectual safeguard, and as an encouragement to our growing manufactures, that the additional duties on imports which are to expire at the end of one year after a peace with Great Britain, be prolonged to the end of two years after that event."-1814. "But there is no subject which can enter with greater force and merit into the deliberations of Congress, than a consideration of the means to preserve and promote the manufactures which have sprung into existence, and attained unparalleled maturity throughout the United States during the period of the European wars. This source of national independence and wealth I anxiously recommend to the prompt and constant guardianship of Congress."-1815. "In adjusting the duties on imports to the object of revenue, the influence of the tariff on manufactures will necessarily present itself for consideration. However wise the theory may be, which leaves to the sagacity and interest of individuals the application of their industry and resources, there are in this, as in other cases, exceptions to the general rule. Besides the consideration which the theory itself implies of a reciprocal adoption by other nations, experience teaches that so many circumstances must occur in introducing and maturing manufacturing establishments, especially of a more complicated kind, that a country inay remain long without them, although sufficiently advanced, and in some respects peculiarly fitted for carrying them on with success. Under circumstances giving a powerful impulse to manufacturing industry, it has made among us a progress, and exhibited an efficiency, which justify the belief that, with a protection not more than is due to the enterprising citizens whose interests are now at stake, it will become, at an early day, not only safe against occasional competition from abroad, but a source of domestic wealth and external commerce. In selecting the branches more especially entitled to public patronage, a preference is obviously claimed by such as will release the United States from a dependence on foreign supplies, ever subject to casual failures, for articles necessary for the public defence, or connected with the that the protective policy had always been a special and prominent object of the government, from the adoption of the constitution down primary wants of individuals. It will be an additional recommendation of particular manufactures, where the materials for them are extensively drawn from our agriculture, and consequently impart and insure to that great fund of national prosperity and independence, an encouragement which can not fail to be rewarded."-Seventh Annual Message. From Monroe's Messages. "Our manufactures will likewise require the systematic and fostering care of the government. Possessing, as we do, all the raw materials, the fruit of our own soil, and industry, we ought not to depend, in the degree we have done, on supplies from other countries. While we are thus dependent, the sudden event of war, unsought and unexpected, can not fail to plunge us into the most serious difficulties. It is important, too, that the capital which nourishes our manufactures should be domestic, as its influence in that case, instead of exhausting, as it must do in foreign hands, would be felt advantageously on agriculture, and every other branch of industry. Equally important is it to provide at home a market for our raw materials; as, by extending the competition, it will enhance the price, and protect the cultivator against the casualties incident to foreign markets.”—Inaugural Address. "Uniformity in the demand and price of an article, is highly desirable to the domestic manufacturer. It is deemed of great importance to give encouragement to our domestic manufactures."-Third Annual Message. "It can not be doubted, that the more complete our internal resources, and the less dependent we are on foreign powers for every national as well as domestic purpose, the greater and more stable will be the public felicity. By the increase of domestic manufactures, will the demand for the rude materials at home be increased; and thus will the dependence of the several parts of the Union on each other, and the strength of the Union itself, be proportionably augmented."—Fifth Annual Message. "Satisfied am I, whatever may be the abstract doctrine in favor of unrestricted commerce, provided all nations would concur in it, and it was not liable to be interrupted by war, which has never occurred, and can not be expected, that there are other strong reasons applicable to our situation and relations with other countries, which impose on us the obligation to cherish and sustain our manufactures. Satisfied I am, however, likewise, that the interest of every part of our Union, even those benefited by manufactures, require that this subject should be touched with the greatest caution, and a critical knowledge of the effects to be produced by the slightest changes.”—Sixth Annual Message. From J. Q. Adams's Messages. "The great interest of an agricultural, commercial, and manufacturing nation, are so linked in union together, that no permanent cause of prosperity to one of them can operate without extending its influence to the other. All these are alike under the protecting power of legislative authority, and the duties of the representative bodies are to conciliate them in harmony together. "Is the self-protecting energy of this nation so helpless, that there exists in the political institutions of our country no power to counteract the bias of foreign legislation; that the growers of grain must submit to the exclusion from the foreign markets of their produce; that the shippers must dismantle their ships, the trade of the north stagnate at the wharves, and the manufacturers starve at their looms, while the whole people shall pay tribute to foreign industry to be clad in foreign to 1830, being a period of fifty years. That it was also sustained by popular opinion, in a quarter where it has since been repudi garbs; that the Congress of the Union are impotent to restore the balance in favor of native industry destroyed by the statutes of any realm?"-Fourth Annual Message. Extract of a Letter from Andrew Jackson, 1824, to Dr. L. H. Coleman, N. C. "Heaven smiled upon and gave us liberty and independence. That same Providence has blessed us with the MEANS of national independence. . . He has filled our mountains and plains with minerals — with lead, iron, and copper- and given us a climate and soil for the growing of hemp and wool. These being the great materials of our national defence, they ought to have extended to them adequate and fair protection, that our manufacturers and laborers may be placed in a fair competition with those of Europe. . . I will ask, what is the real situation of the agriculturist? Where has the American farmer a market for his surplus produce? Except for cotton, he has neither a foreign, nor a home market. Does not this clearly prove, when there is no market at home or abroad, that there is too much labor employed in agriculture, and that the channels for labor should be multiplied? Common sense at once points out the remedy: Draw from agriculture this superabundant labor; employ it in mechanism and manufactures, thereby creating a home market for your breadstuffs distributing labor to the most profitable account; and benefits to the country will result. Take from agriculture, in the United States, 600,000 men, women, and children, and you will at once give a market for more breadstuffs than all Europe now furnishes us with. In short, sir, we have been too long subject to the policy of British merchants. It is time we should become a little more Americanized, and instead of feeding paupers and laborers of England, feed our own; or else, in a short time, by continuing our present policy, we shall be paupers ourselves. . . The experience of the late war ought to teach us a lesson, and one never to be forgotten. If our liberty, and republican form of government, procured for us by our Revolutionary fathers, are worth the blood and treasure by which they were obtained, it is surely our duty to protect and defend them. . . It is, therefore, my opinion, that a careful and judicious tariff is much wanted, to pay our national debt, and afford us the means of that defence within ourselves on which the safety of our country and liberty depends; and last, though not least, give a proper distribution to our labor, which must prove beneficial to the happiness, independence, and wealth of the community." From Jackson's Second Annual Message. "The power to impose duties upon imports originally belonged to the several states. The right to adjust these duties, with a view to the encouragement of domestic branches of industry, is so completely identical with that power, that it is difficult to suppose the existence of the one without the other. The states have delegated their whole authority over imports to the general government, without limitation or restriction, saving the very inconsiderable reservation relating to the inspection laws. This authority having thus entirely passed from the states, the right to exercise it for the purpose of protection does not exist in them; and, consequently, if it be not possessed by the general government, it must be extinct. Our political system would thus present the anomaly of a people stripped of the right to foster their own industry, and to counteract the most selfish and destructive policy which might be adopted by foreign nations. This surely can not be the case this indispensable power, thus surrendered by the states, must be within the scope of authority on the subject expressly delegated to Congress. In this |