Competitive Practices in the Title Insurance Industry: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Monopolies and Commercial Law of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 1766, Antitrust Damages Clarification Act of 1987, May 4, 1988, Volume 4U.S. Government Printing Office, 1989 - 313 páginas |
Outras edições - Ver tudo
Palavras e frases frequentes
abstractors action doctrine active supervision administrative law judge agency agents Anito antitrust exemption antitrust laws approved attorney Arthur D attorney-agents attorney's opinion bill Bowling business of insurance Chairman charges competition complaint counsel conduct Connecticut consumers cost coverage DiSanto economic enforcement escrow Everbach examination services federal antitrust Federal Trade Commission fees hearings Initial Decision insurance commissioner insurance department Insurance Rating Bureau investment Ippel issue Jim Mattox joint rate Lawyers Title legislation litigation MATTOX McCarran Act McCarran-Ferguson Act Midcal MOORHEAD NAIC Ohio Pennsylvania percent Pireno Plotkin practice premium price fixing rate filings rate of return real estate regulatory requirement return on total risk spreading RODINO Royal Drug search and examination settlement services Southern Motor Carriers statute subcommittee Supreme Court Ticor Title title defects title insurance business title insurance companies title insurance industry title insurance policy title insurance rates title search total capital treble damage underwriting profit Wisconsin ZUCKERMAN
Passagens conhecidas
Página 199 - 1914, as amended, known as the Clayton Act, and the Act of September 26, 1914, known as the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, shall be applicable to the business of insurance to the extent that such business is not regulated by State law. Sec. 3 (a) Until June 30, 1948, the Act of July 2,
Página 199 - (b) No Act of Congress shall be construed to invalidate, impair, or supersede any law enacted by any State for the purpose of regulating the business of insurance, or. which imposes a fee or tax upon such business, unless such Act
Página 199 - Anti-Discrimination Act, shall not apply to the business of insurance or to acts in the conduct thereof. (b) Nothing contained in this chapter shall render the said Sherman Act inapplicable to any agreement to boycott, coerce, or intimidate, or act of boycott, coercion, or intimidation.
Página 199 - on the part of the Congress shall not be construed to impose any barrier to the regulation or taxation of such business by the several States. Sec. 2(a) The business of insurance, and every person engaged therein,
Página 120 - findings and conclusions and the right to appeal the initial decision to the Commission under Section 3.52 of the Commission's Rules of Practice for Adjudicative Proceedings. Failure to answer within the time above provided shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of your right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and
Página 120 - place you will have the right under said Act to appear and show cause why an order should not be entered requiring you to cease and desist from the violations of law charged in this complaint. You are notified that the opportunity is afforded you to file with the
Página 120 - mission, on the charges set forth in this complaint, at which time and place you will have the right under said Act to appear and show cause why an order should not be entered requiring you to cease and desist from the violations of law charged in this complaint. You are notified that the opportunity is afforded you to file with the
Página 120 - statement of the facts constituting each ground of defense; and specific admission, denial, or explanation of each fact alleged in the complaint or, if you are without knowledge thereof, a statement to that effect. Allegations of the complaint not thus answered shall be deemed to have been admitted. If you elect not to contest the allegations of fact set forth in the complaint, the answer
Página 199 - as amended, known as the Sherman Act, and the Act of October IS, 1914, as amended, known as the Clayton Act, and the Act of September 26, 1914, known as the Federal Trade
Página 213 - Contrary to the Government's arguments, our holding here does not suggest that a State may "give immunity to those who violate the Sherman Act by authorizing them to violate it." Parker v. Brown 317 US at 351,