...91 US 150, 157 : "It is no new invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine is entitled to the benefit of all the uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he had cancel red the idea of the use or not." See, also, Stowe v. City of Chicago, 21 0. G. 790. The sixth...

...improvements, each of which is or may be auxiliary to produce the same general result. The invenior of a machine is entitled to the benefit of all the uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he conceived the idea of the use or not. An "improved driving gearing," included in the specification...

...improvements, each of which is or may be auxiliary to produce the same general result. The inventor of a machine is entitled to the benefit of all the uses to which it can be put, no mutter whether he conceived the idea of the use or not. An "improved driving gearing," included in...

...157, it is said: " It is no new invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine is entitled to the benefit of all the uses...true, it may be said, that the several parts which make up complainants' mechanism are old, but, as is stated by the court in Strong v. Noble, 3 Fisher,...

...a new invention. It is no new invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine is entitled to the benefit of all the uses...whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not. Lyman had the descending current. True, he concentrated the air as it fell, and sent it downwards through...

...LoniNO, WILLIAM STRONG. Argument of counsel. Mr. Arthur ». Briesen, for appellant : The inventor of a machine is entitled to the benefit of all the uses...whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not. Smith v. Nichols, 21 Wall. 112 [9 Am. & Eng. 425 ;] Roberts v. Ryer, 91 US 150 [10 Am. & Eng. 302;]...

...no new invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine is entitled to all the uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not." In Pennsylvania Railway v. Locomotive Truck Co., 110 US 490, 494, the adoption of a truck for locomotives...

...no new invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine is entitled to all the uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not.v In Pennsylvania Railway v. Locomotive Truck Co., 110 US 490, 494, the adoption of a truck for...

...is no new invention louse an old machine for a new purpose. The inventor of a machine is entitled to all the uses to which it can be put, no matter whether he had conceived the idea of tbe use or not." In I'fiinaylrania It. Co. v. Locomo/iec EngineA A T.(.'o., 110 US 490, 494 (28: 223,...

...purpose, and that the inventor of a machine was entitled to the benefit of all the uses to which it could be put, no matter whether he had conceived the idea of the use or not. It is contended, as against the wire bells, that the evidence does not show the application of the patented...