We hold it to be clear that the interest which can protect a power after the death of a person who creates it must be an interest in the thing itself. In other words, the power must be engrafted on an estate in the thing. The words themselves would seem... The Lehigh Valley Law Reporter - Página 34por Pennsylvania - 1887Visualização integral - Acerca deste livro
| United States. Supreme Court - 1823 - 756 páginas
...be clear,- that the interest which can protect a pOWer after the death of a person who creates it, must be an interest in the thing itself. In other...is a power which accompanies, or is connected with, an interest. The power and the interest are united in the same person. But if we are to understand... | |
| Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1851 - 860 páginas
...be clear that the interest which can protect a power after the death of the person who creates it, must be an interest in the thing itself. In other words, the power must be grafted on the estate in the thing. A power coupled with an interest is a power which accompanies or... | |
| 1847 - 554 páginas
...to be clear, that the interest which can protect a power after the death of a person who creates it, must be an interest in the thing itself. In other...is a power which accompanies, or is connected with, an interest. The power and the interest are united in the same person. But if we are to underHunt w.... | |
| William Paley - 1847 - 732 páginas
...to be clear, that the interest which can protect a power after the death of a person who creates it, must be an interest in the thing itself. In other...is a power which accompanies, or is connected with an interest. The power and the interest are united in the same person. But if we are to understand... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1907 - 798 páginas
...to be clear that the interest which can protect a power after the death of a person who creates it must be an interest in the thing itself. In other...is a power which accompanies, or is connected with, an interest. The power and the interest are united in the same person. But, if we are to understand... | |
| United States. Supreme Court, Benjamin Robbins Curtis - 1864 - 594 páginas
...clear that the interest which can protect a power after the death of a person who creates it, mast be an interest in the thing itself. In other words,...is a power which accompanies or is connected with an interest. The power and the interest are united in the same person. But if we are to understand... | |
| Emory Washburn - 1864 - 912 páginas
...to be clear, that the interest which can protect a power after the death of a person who creates it, must be an interest in the thing itself. In other...power must be engrafted on an estate in the thing." After stating that a power to A to sell for his own benefit would not give him an interest, nor would... | |
| John Innes Clark Hare - 1871 - 952 páginas
...to be clear that the interest which can protect a power after the death of a person who creates it, must be an interest in the thing itself. In other...engrafted on an estate in the thing. The words themselves seem to import this meaning. "A power coupled with an interest," is a power which accompanies, or is... | |
| Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1874 - 678 páginas
...to be clear, that the interest which can protect a power after the death of a person who creates it, must be an interest in the thing itself. In other...engrafted on an estate in the thing. The words themselves should seem to import this meaning. 'A power coupled with an interest,' is a power which accompanies,... | |
| United States. Circuit Court (5th Circuit), William Burnham Woods - 1875 - 796 páginas
...power after the death of a person who creates it must be an inLockett \s. Hill and another. terest in the thing itself. In other words, the power must be engrafted on an estate in the thing." Does the power now in question answer the definition given in Hardres, or the equally accurate description... | |
| |