Participation and Power: Civic Discourse in Environmental Policy DecisionsState University of New York Press, 01/02/2012 - 214 páginas Participation and Power examines the ways in which citizens are allowed to participate in environmental policy decision making. Despite requirements that mandate public participation, institutional practices and current models of public participation often exclude citizens from anything other than a superficial role. W. Michele Simmons offers a firsthand look at risk communication and public participation practices through a case study involving the disposal of VX nerve agent. Arguing that a rhetoric for civic discourse in policy debates is needed, she constructs a theory of democratic and ethical public involvement that grants citizens more power in the decision-making process. |
Índice
1 | |
MAPPING PUBLICPARTICIPATION AND POWER IN RISK COMMUNICATION PRACTICES | 25 |
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN DECISIONS ABOUT VX NERVE AGENT DISPOSAL AT THE NEWPORT CHEMICAL DEPOT | 43 |
CREATING A SPACE FOR PUBLIC DISCOURSE IN TECHNICAL ISSUES | 85 |
TRANSFORMING THE POSSIBILITIESOF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY DECISIONS | 121 |
CIVIC RESEARCHINFROM THE ACADEMY | 141 |
HEIGHTENED NATIONAL SECURITY AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION | 153 |
PUBLIC NOTICE SAMPLE | 165 |
SAMPLE OF COMMENTSSECTION FROM FINAL ENVIRONMENTALIMPACT STATEMENT | 171 |
SAMPLE OF COMMENTSSECTION FROM IDEM NOTICEOF DECISION | 175 |
HOUSE ENROLLEDACT NO 1143 | 179 |
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERSABOUT THE NEWPORT CHEMICAL DEPOT | 181 |
NOTES | 183 |
189 | |
199 | |
SAMPLE OF COMMENTSSECTION FROM DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT | 167 |
Outras edições - Ver tudo
Participation and Power: Civic Discourse in Environmental Policy Decisions W. Michele Simmons Pré-visualização limitada - 2008 |
Participation and Power: Civic Discourse in Environmental Policy Decisions W. Michele Simmons Pré-visualização indisponível - 2007 |
Palavras e frases frequentes
According action active affected agencies agent allowed approach appropriate argues Army asked asserts assessment bring chapter citizens civic complex concerns consider construction contribute created debates decision-making process determine develop discourse discussions disposal documents encourage environmental decision environmental policy ethical examine example facility federal Figure final framework Further groups identify illustrate implemented incineration individuals influence input institutions interaction interested involved issues knowledge maintained Management multiple Newport Chemical Depot noted officials participatory particular parties permit policy decisions possible practices prevent procedures Program proposed public involvement public meetings public participation public policy questions regulations relations representatives response result rhetoric risk communication scientific significant situation social space specific stockpile strategies studies suggests technical communicators technical experts tion understand usability users valued