...purpose, and is not comprised in the general powers arid jurisdiction of the court. It is a general rule, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a supreme court but that which specially appears to be so ; and, on the contrary, nothing s\\a\\ be intended...

...stated ; and, secondly, whether, if they are so, they support the pleas. It is an established rule, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction...superior court but that which specially appears to be so, nor any thing within the jurisdiction of an inferior court but that which is so expressly alleged,...

...has exceeded its own jurisdiction, unless it is apparent that it has done so. Aтm. 10 Mod. 71. 4. Nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction...superior court but that which specially appears to be so ; but, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within the jurisdiction of an inferior court...

...statute, as upon the authority of that well known and established legal maxim, in l Sand. (Wms.) 74 a, " that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction...Court, but that which specially appears to be so." Mr. Justice Botanquet said, " The real question here is, hat there been an txceti of juritdiction ?...

...accordance with the distinction; well settled in the books, and which is an important rule of pleading, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court, but what expressly appears to be so, nor within the jurisdiction of an inferior court, but what is expressly...

...afterwards. If the indictment had stated merely that the Judge had issued the summon*, it would be enough. " The rule for jurisdiction is, that nothing shall be...intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior (a) 5 M.Sf S. 248. (6) 7 QB 543. (c) Note to Colder v. Hatket, 3 Moore, Pr. CC36. XII. VICTORIA.] court,...

...645 ; William* v. Germaine, 7 B. & C. 468.) The rule of pleading the jurisdiction of Inferior Courts is, "that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a Superior but that which specially appears to be so : and, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within...

...in Wales, county palatine of Chester, and the court of Ely — Pigye v. Gardner, 1 Lev. 208 : for, " nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court, but what expressly appears to be so ; nor within the jurisdiction of an inferior court, but what is expressly...

...pleading is well expressed thus :—" The old rule I ordinary courts are bound to obey the process delifor jurisdiction is, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of the Superior Courts but that which specially appears to be so ; nothing islntended to be within the...

...of a judgment in an inferior court must f/'\ ideo considcratum est per curiam, otherwise it is bad. Nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court, but what expressly appears to be so; nor within the jurisdiction of an in*[ 75 ] entries of judgments in...