...the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (12 USC 18311); section 106 of the Bank Holding Company Act Amendments of 1970 (12 USC 1972); and the International Lending Supervision Act of 1983 (Pub. L. 98-181, title LX). The BHC Act is codified...

...practice that would lead a consumer to believe that an extension of credit, in violation of section 106(b) of the Bank Holding Company Act Amendments of 1970 (12 USC 1972), is conditional upon either: (1) The purchase of an insurance product or annuity from the bank or any...

...practice that would lead a consumer to believe that an extension of credit, in violation of section 106(b) of the Bank Holding Company Act Amendments of 1970 (12 USC 1972), is conditional upon either: (1) The purchase of an insurance product or annuity from the bank or any...

...that they obtain a loan. This allegation Ignores that fact that coercion is Illegal. Section 106(b) of the Bank Holding Company Act Amendments of 1970 (12 USC 1972) prohibits a bank from extending credit . . . ... on the condition or requirement — * * » (2) that...

...that they obtain a loan. This allegation ignores that fact that coercion is illegal. Section 106(b) of the Bank Holding Company Act Amendments of 1970 (12 USC 1972) prohibits a bank from extending credit . . . ... on the condition or requirement — III (2) that the...

...the fact that the language is unnecessary, attached hereto are copies of the present law, Section 106 of the Bank Holding Company Act Amendments of 1970 (12 USC 1972) and the subject portion of S. 1720 with the redundant language in brackets and underscored. I 8 It...

...the Administration's Proposal are Underlined; Deletions are in Brackets] Sec. 38. Subsection 106 (b) of the Bank Holding Company Act Amendments of 1970 (12 USC 1972 (i)) is hereby amended to read as follows; (1) A bank or its depository institution securities affiliate...

...Many of these protections, at least for the banking industry, already exist. For example. Section 106 of the Bank Holding Company Act Amendments of 1970..."tie-ins" would subject violators to substantial damages. The ABA would continue to support the application of this existing statutory provision. Moreover, ABA...

...already exist. For example, Section 106 of the Bank Holding Company Act Amendments of 1970 (12 use 1972) prevents consumers from being required to purchase..."tie-ins" would subject violators to substantial damages. The ABA would continue to support the application of this existing statutory provision. Moreover, ABA...

...already exist. For example, Section 106 of the Bank Holding Company Act Amendments of 1970 (12 U5.C 1972) prevents consumers from being required to purchase..."tie-ins" would subject violators to substantial damages. The ABA supports the application of this existing statutory provision. Moreover, ABA would support...