| John Tessitore, Susan Woolfson - 1997 - 360 páginas
...would appear to make them second-class citizens within NATO. The latter oppose it because they claim to have "no intention, no plan, and no reason to deploy...— and ... do not foresee any future need to do SO" [NATO statement following Brussels meeting, 11/17-18/96]. NATO refuses tO rule OUt the possibility... | |
| United States. Congress. Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe - 1997 - 236 páginas
...Alliance will not require a change in NATO's current nuclear posture and therefore, NATO countries have no intention, no plan, and no reason to deploy...of NATO's nuclear posture or nuclear policy — and we do not foresee any future need to do so. A number of countries have longstanding aspirations to... | |
| Richard Lugar - 1997 - 54 páginas
...NATO enlargement will not require a change in NATO's nuclear posture, and, therefore, NATO countries have no intention, no plan, and no reason to deploy nuclear weapons on the territory of new members. We concur with NATO's decision to carry out its collective defense mission by ensuring interoperability,... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1997 - 194 páginas
...although at the December North Atlantic Council meeting, Alliance Ministers affirmed that NATO had "no intention, no plan, and no reason to deploy nuclear weapons on the territory of new members." Furthermore, all new members will join the Alliance's collective defense arrangements which remain... | |
| United States. Congress. Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe - 1997 - 228 páginas
...1997, NATO summit in Madrid to discuss the beginning of accession negotiations. It also noted NATO has "no intention, no plan, and no reason to deploy nuclear weapons on the territory of new members...." A key factor in the length of the negotiations with prospective new members could be the readiness... | |
| Joseph R. Biden - 1997 - 68 páginas
...weapons deployments, as articulated by the North Atlantic Council on December 10, 1996, that NATO members have "no intention, no plan and no reason" to deploy nuclear weapons on the territory of states that are not now members of the alliance, nor do they foresee any future need to do so. President... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services - 1997 - 116 páginas
...Ministers were merely reaffirming that decision in December 1996 with their statement that NATO has "no intention, no plan, and no reason" to deploy nuclear weapons on the territory of new NATO members. In considering the issue, the HLG and Ministers took into account the changes in the... | |
| Frank H. Columbus - 1998 - 304 páginas
...forces. Senator Biden further noted that the Alliance publicly stated in December 1996 that it had "no intention, no plan, and no reason to deploy nuclear weapons on the territory of new members" and in March 1997 it stated that there was no need to deploy combat troops in the new member countries.... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1998 - 576 páginas
...weapons deployments, as articulated by the North Atlantic Council on December 10, 1996, that NATO members have "no intention, no plan and no reason" to deploy nuclear weapons on the territory of states that are not now members of the alliance, nor do they foresee any future need to do so. President... | |
| |