North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Enlargement Costs: Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifth Congress, First Session : Special HearingsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1998 - 163 páginas |
Outras edições - Ver tudo
Palavras e frases frequentes
additional Administration's air defense aircraft Alliance Answer areas assessment billion Bosnia Chairman STEVENS civilian CLARK Cold War command commitment committee common budgets common funding continue contribute cost estimates costs of enlargement Czech Republic defense budget defense planning defense spending democracy democratic deployment develop DOD's economic enlargement costs equipment Europe European allies expansion fense fiscal force goals force structure future going Hungarian Hungary increase infrastructure Initiative interoperability invited issue Klaus Kinkel meet membership ment military capability military requirements mission nations NATO enlargement NATO expansion NATO's nuclear sharing nuclear weapons operations participation Partnership for Peace peacekeeping percent personnel Poland political priority prospective NATO members Question Russia Secretary Albright Secretary COHEN Senator HUTCHISON Senator INOUYE SFOR SHELTON Slovenia START II statement strategic Thank threat three countries three invitees tion Treaty troops United Warsaw Warsaw Pact
Passagens conhecidas
Página 75 - reiterate that they have no intention, no plan and no reason to deploy nuclear weapons on the territory of new members nor any need to change any aspect of NATO's nuclear posture or nuclear policy—and do not foresee any future need to do so.
Página 4 - we agree to maintain and develop the collective capacity to resist? In other words, are we going to be expected to send substantial numbers of troops over there as a more or less permanent contribution to the development of these countries' capacity to resist? Secretary Acheson
Página 45 - In the current and foreseeable security environment, the alliance will carry out its collective defense and other missions by ensuring the necessary interoperability, integration, and capability for reinforcement, rather than by additional permanent stationing of substantial combat forces.
Página 3 - 1997 US SENATE, COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS, Washington, DC. The committee met at 10 am, in room SD-192, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. Ted Stevens (chairman) presiding. Present: Senators Stevens,
Página 38 - A larger NATO will be a stronger NATO and will provide a wider allegiance in Europe to our values. It was the creation of NATO in 1949 that halted Soviet designs on western Europe. It was the enlargement of NATO, with Greece and Turkey in 1952, West Germany in 1955, and Spain in 1982, that helped strengthen the
Página 86 - current nuclear posture. NATO countries have no intention, no plan, and no reason to deploy nuclear weapons on the territory of new member states,
Página 87 - no intention, no plan, and no reason" to deploy nuclear weapons on the territory of new NATO members.
Página 21 - Black Seas. We waged the cold war in part because these nations were held captive. We fought World War II in part because they had been invaded. If there were a major threat to the security of their region,
Página 99 - Mr. Chairman, I ask that my entire statement be made a part of the record, and I look forward to hearing from
Página 87 - of new members nor any need to change any aspect of NATO's nuclear posture or nuclear policy—and do not foresee any future need to do so.