...Goldberg v. Daniels, 231 US 218. It is not a case where the sovereign Opinion of the Court. 330 US admittedly has title to property and is sued by those...equity or on rights arising under Acts of Congress. Cunningham v. Macon & Brunswick R . Co., supra; Minnesota v. Hitchcock, 185 US 373 ; Oregon v. Hitchcock,...

...Goldberg v. Daniels, 231 US 218. It is not a case where the sovereign Opinion of the Court. 330 US admittedly has title to property and is sued by those...equity or on rights arising under Acts of Congress. Cunningham v. Macon & Brunswick R. Co., supra; Minnesota v. Hitchcock, 185 US 373 ; Oregon v. Hitchcock,...

...Goldberg v. Daniels, 231 US 218. It is not a case where the sovereign Opinion of the Court. 330 US admittedly has title to property and is sued by those...equity or on rights arising under Acts of Congress. Cunningham v. A/ aeon & Brunswick R. Co., supra; Minnesota v. Hitchcock, 185 US 373; Oregon v. Hitchcock,...

[ O conteúdo desta página está restrito ]

...case was to grant possession to the private claimant” (p. 737). [Emphasis ours.] “It is not a case where the sovereign admittedly has title to property...equity or on rights arising under acts of Congress. * * * We say the foregoing cases are distinguishable from the present one, though as a matter of logic...

...the plaintiff seeks to divest the Government of title. See Jfagmmo v. Hitchcock, 202 US 473, 476, 20 S. Ct. 667, 50 L. Ed. 1113. The Supreme Court, in...United States. Land v. Dollar, 330 US 731, 737, 738, 67 S. Ct. 1009, 91 L. Ed. 1209." Dated : Charlotte Amalie, VI, May 18, 1956. Respectfully, LEON P....

...case was to grant possession to the private claimant" (p. 737). [Emphasis ours.] "It is not a ease where the sovereign admittedly has title to property...equity or on rights arising under acts of Congress. « » * We say the foregoing cases are distinguishable from the present one, though as a matter of...

[ O conteúdo desta página está restrito ]

[ O conteúdo desta página está restrito ]

...specific performance of a contract to deliver property of the United States * * * It is not a case where the sovereign admittedly has title to property...being based on an allegedly superior equity or on rlghtg arising under Acts of Congress. * * * "* * * But the rule iB based on practical considerations...