Inauspicious Beginnings: Principal Powers and International Security Institutions After the Cold War, 1989-1999Université du Québec à Montréal. Centre d'études des politiques étrangères et de sécurité, Raoul-Dandurand Chair of Strategic and Diplomatic Studies McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP, 2004 - 311 páginas Shows the emerging 'new world order' was marked by the overwhelming power of the United States Inauspicious Beginnings shows that at the end of the Cold War many experts in the international community expected a new world order to emerge in which international security institutions - such as the United Nations Security Council and NATO - would play a major role in preventing and ending conflicts. But while the 1990s proved to be a decade of international insecurity and major humanitarian disasters, thus demonstrating the need for a wider and more efficient system of security institutions, the principal powers failed to create them. Instead, the emerging order was marked by the overwhelming power of the United States, which, under the Bush Sr and Clinton administrations, did not see such a system as a necessity. |
Índice
Security Institutions after the Cold War | 3 |
1 Contradictory or Complementary? Defensive Realism Structural Liberalism and American Policy towards International Security Institutions | 23 |
Russian Institutional Security Strategy during the Yeltsin Years | 57 |
International Security Institutions as an Alternative to Power Politics | 85 |
German Foreign Policy and International Security Institutions since Unification | 107 |
5 Refusing to Play by the Rules? Japans Pacifist Identity Alliance Politics and Security Institutions | 131 |
6 The Institutional Security Policy Reorientation of China | 165 |
Canada and International Security Institutions after the Cold War | 189 |
Minimalism and Selfinterest Comparing PrincipalPower Performance in Security Institutions | 217 |
Notes | 241 |
295 | |
303 | |
Outras edições - Ver tudo
Inauspicious Beginnings: Principal Powers and International Security ... Onnig Beylerian,Jacques Lévesque Pré-visualização limitada - 2004 |
Palavras e frases frequentes
action alliance allies American approach ASEAN Asia Asian behaviour Beijing Bosnia Canada China Chinese Clinton administration Cold Cold War conflict constructivist cooperation countries crisis defensive realism diplomacy diplomatic economic enlargement étrangères Europe European favour force Foreign Affairs foreign policy framework France French Germany Germany's Gorbachev identity important influence institutional security institutionalism institutionalist international institutions international relations international security institutions international system ISIS issue Japan Japanese Jiang Zemin KEDO Kosovo leadership major powers ment middle powers military Minister Moscow multilateral national interests Nations Security NATO NATO's negotiations neoliberal norms North Korea nuclear operations OSCE participation peace peacekeeping permanent members permanent seat political position post-Cold principal powers regional rity role Russia secu Security Council reform security policy Senkaku Senkaku Islands Somalia Soviet Union Spratlys status strategy theory threat tion tional treaty UN Security Council United Nations University Press UNSC USSR veto voice Western powers York