 | United States. Supreme Court - 1928 - 872 páginas
...incitement, between preparation and attempt, between assembling and conspiracy, must be borne in mind. In order to support a finding of clear and present...believe that such advocacy was then contemplated. 8 Compare Judge Learned Hand in Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten, 244 Fed. 535, 540; Judge Amidon in... | |
 | Arthur Garfield Hays - 1928 - 388 páginas
...service to the ideals of free institutions. They are fearful. As was said by Mr. Justice Brandeis :18 "Those who won our independence by revolution were...They did not exalt order at the cost of liberty." And then these ringing words : "Those who won our independence believed that the final end of the State... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Judiciary - 1970 - 1258 páginas
...storms in the physical." As Justice Brandeis put it in Whitney v. California, 274 US 357, 377 (1927), "Those who won our independence by revolution were...They did not exalt order at the cost of liberty." Justice Douglas' book, like Secretary Hickel's letter, is, of course, profoundly anti-revolutionary.... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1970 - 1794 páginas
...in the physical.'' As Justice Brandeis put it in Whitney v. California-. 274 ILS. 357, 377 (1927), "Those who won our independence by revolution were...They did not exalt order at the cost of liberty." Justice Douglas' book, like Secretary Hickel's letter, is, of course, profoundly anti-revolutionary.... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Internal Security - 1974 - 630 páginas
...concurring 407 US ents.13 As Justice Brandois said, concurring in Whitney v. California, 274 UK 357, 377: "Those who won our independence by revolution were...They did not exalt order at the cost of liberty." Chief Justice Warren put it this way in United States v. Robel, 389 US 258, 264: "[T]his concept of... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Internal Security Committee - 1974 - 630 páginas
...concurring 407 US ents." As Justice Brandois said, concurring in Whitney v. California, 274 US 357, 377: "Those who won our independence by revolution were...They did not exalt order at the cost of liberty." Chief Justice Warren put it this way in United States v. Robel, 389 US 258, 264: "[T]his concept of... | |
 | United States. Congress. Joint Committee on Congressional Operations - 1976 - 1336 páginas
...enacting this unprecedented limit on free political communication. The First Amendment demands no less: "Those who won our independence by revolution were...change. They did not exalt order at the cost of liberty. * * * If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil... | |
| |
In order to support a finding of clear and present danger it must be shown either that immediate serious violence was to be expected or was advocated, or that the past conduct furnished reason to believe that such advocacy was then contemplated. Those... 
