Montgomery County Law Reporter, Volume 7Montgomery Bar Association, 1892 |
Outras edições - Ver tudo
Palavras e frases frequentes
action affidavit of defence agreement alleged amount Appeal application assignment auditor award bill building Cascaden charge Charles Hunsicker Chester County claim Common Pleas Conshohocken contract Corson court by SWARTZ court by WEAND Court of Common court of equity Cowden creditors creek damages debt decree deed defendant dismissed entered entitled equity evidence exceptions executor facias fact February 9 fieri facias filed fraud fund guardian held injury inquest interest Joseph Fornance judgment June 16 jury land Larzelere & Gibson legatees lien March 23 matter ment Merion Montgomery County mortgage motion negligence Nicholas F notice Opinion Orphans owner paid parties payment Penna person petition petitioners plaintiff Pleas of Montgomery premises Prizer proceedings Quarter Sessions question real estate reason road rule September 21 Slingluff statute street suit sustained testator tion Township trust verdict viewers VII.-No Whitemarsh Township
Passagens conhecidas
Página 105 - ... shall at all times furnish pure gas and water, and any citizen using the same may make complaint of impurity or deficiency in quantity, or both, to the court of common pleas of the proper county, by bill filed, and after hearing the parties touching the same, the said court shall have power to make such order in the premises as may seem just and equitable, and may dismiss the complaints or compel the corporation to correct the evil complained of.
Página 142 - If the title fairly gives notice of the subject of the act, so as reasonably to lead to an Inquiry Into the body of the bill, It is all that is necessary.
Página 142 - No bill, except general appropriation bills, shall be passed containing more than one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title...
Página 111 - Nor where any party to a thing or contract in action is dead or has been adjudged a lunatic and his right thereto or therein has passed, either by his own act or by the act of the law, to a party on the record, who represents his interest in the subject in controversy...
Página 95 - That no defeasance to any deed for real estate, regular and absolute upon its face, made after the passage of this act, shall have the effect of reducing it to a mortgage, unless the said defeasance is made at the time the deed is made and is in writing, signed, sealed, acknowledged and delivered by the grantee in the deed to the grantor...
Página 127 - As between principal and third parties the true limit of the agent's authority to bind the former is the apparent authority with which the agent is invested; but as between the principal and the agent the true limit is the express authority or instruction given to the agent. Evans, Ag.
Página 106 - ... said property, franchises and rights were located, used, levied upon and sold in the county wherein said writ of execution was issued." It is obvious that such comprehensive process was not designed for the collection of a judgment founded on a mechanics
Página 96 - Mission when the engine was stopped, she might, it appears, have passed her in safety. Not a moment appears to have been lost on board of the steamer, in giving or in executing the orders which the occasion called for; and we think she is not in any degree responsible for the disaster. In this view of the case, it is unnecessary to inquire whether any blame can be attached to The Mission. For, whether she was or was not managed unskillfully or negligently, The Columbus not being in fault, is not...
Página 191 - ... a widow or child or children, although such child or children be born after the death of their father, every such person, so far as shall regard the widow or child or children, after born, shall be deemed and construed to die intestate; and such widow, child or children, shall be entitled to such purports, shares and dividends of the estate, real and personal, of the deceased, as if he had actually died without any will.
Página 180 - ... for the contractor. But the building in this case was not erected without the consent of the wife, under a contract made with a stranger. It was erected under a contract made with the husband, and, as the facts abundantly show, with the knowledge, approbation, and concurrence of the wife. It is true...