| 1888 - 564 páginas
...where the owner leases premises which area nuisance, or mi! -i in the nature of things become so by their use, and receives rent, then whether in or out of possession, he le liable for injuries resulting from such nuisance. Numerous cases support this view, Rosewell v.... | |
| 1890 - 1166 páginas
...where the owner leases premises which are a nuisance, or must, in the nature of things, become so by their use, and receives rent, then, whether in or out of possession, he is liable for injuries received from such nuisance. In Albert v. State, 66 Md. 325, 7 At!. Kep. 697, the action... | |
| 1887 - 924 páginas
...where the owner leases premises which are a nuisance, or must in the nature of things become so by their use, and receives rent, then, whether in or out of possession, he is liable for injuries resulting from such nuisance. Numerous cases support this view. Rosewell v. Prior, 2 Salk.... | |
| 1898 - 1148 páginas
...owner leases premises which are a nuisance, or must In the nature of things become so by their user, and receives rent, then, whether in or out of possession, he is liable." In Maenner v. Carroll, 4d Md. 216, Mr. Justice Alvey, delivering the opinion of the court, held that,... | |
| 1915 - 1106 páginas
...must be admitted, for the law is well settled that where an owner leases premises which are a nuisance and receives rent, then, whether in or out of possession, he is liable if he knew or with the exercise of reasonable diligence could have known of its condition. This is... | |
| 1891 - 1138 páginas
...owner leases premises which are a nuisance, or must In the nature of things become so by their uses, and receives rent, then, whether in or out of possession, he is liable. " It would not do, as this court says in Albert's Case, for the owner, knowing the condition of his... | |
| Thomas Beven - 1895 - 1072 páginas
...owner leases premises which are a nuisance, or must in the nature of things become so by their user, and receives rent, then, whether in or out of possession, he is liable.4 It has furthermore been particularly laid down3 that there are Two ways in only two ways in... | |
| Edward Beers Thomas - 1904 - 1488 páginas
...where the owner leases premises which are a nuiMnce, or must, in the nature of things, become so by their use, and receives rent, then, whether in or out of possession, he is liable for injuries received from such nuisance. In Albert v. State. 66 Md. 325, the action was brought by... | |
| James Smith McMaster - 1905 - 966 páginas
...where the owner leases premises which are a nuisance, or must in the nature of things become so by their use, and receives rent, then, whether in or out of possession, he is liable for injuries resulting from such nuisance.' The law as thus stated was followed in Adams v. Fletcher,... | |
| Colorado. Supreme Court - 1914 - 668 páginas
...owner leases premises which are a nuisance, or must in the nature of things become so by their user, and receives rent, then, whether in or out of possession, he is liable for injuries resulting from such nuisance." Continuing, on page 337 the court said: "A wharf, furnishing... | |
| |