...corroborated upon points material to the conviction, and to such an extent as, upon the whole case, to satisfy the jury beyond a reasonable doubt of the guilt of the respondent. State v. Howard, 380. ACTION. 1. In consequence of erroneous information given by an...

...45. It must be on points material to the conviction, and to such an extent, as, upon the whole case, to satisfy the jury, beyond a reasonable doubt, of the guilt of the defendant. The State v. Howard, 32 Vt. 380. Proving by other witnesses that a robbery was in fact committed in...

...witness be corroborated, either by another witness, or by circumstantial evidence sufficiently strong to satisfy the jury beyond a reasonable doubt of the guilt of the accused." The State of Ohio v. Courtright, 66 Ohio St., 35. It therefore follows that before a...

...men would act upon in matters of great importance, and yet not convince the minds and consciences of the jury beyond a reasonable doubt of the guilt of the defendant." (State v. Dineen, 10 Min. 416-7.) This decision was approved and followed in The State v. Shetllnvorth...

...on a theory which excludes guilt, then it cannot be said that the facts in the case are sufficient to satisfy the jury, beyond a reasonable doubt, of the guilt of the defendant, and in that event she should be acquitted. I am asked by the defendant to charge the following : "If,...

...reasonable doubt must be resolved in favor of the defendant and the burden is upon the prosecution to satisfy the Jury beyond a reasonable doubt of the guilt of the defendant. Upon the issue of former jeopardy, the burden is upon the defendant •For other cue« g«e aam* topic...

...witness be corroborated, either by another witness, or by circumstantial evidence sufficiently strong to satisfy the jury beyond a reasonable doubt of the guilt of the accused." State of Ohio v. Courtright, 66 Ohio St 36, 63 NE 500. It therefore follows that before...

...reason of Insanity, are both interposed, the burden of proof as to the first plea is upon the state to satisfy the jury beyond a reasonable doubt of the guilt of defendant; but, as to the second plea, the burden of proof is upon defendant to establish the plea...

...of appellant's testimony, and that was sufficient to sustain a conviction if the testimony satisfied the Jury beyond a reasonable doubt of the guilt of the defendant. Conceding, therefore, the instruction to be erroneous, it is not prejudicial, and does not call for...

...reasonable hypothesis other than that of the defendant's guilt, or if they do not satisfy the mind of the jury, beyond a reasonable doubt, of the guilt of the defendant, then he cannot be legally convicted, and you must acquit him. § 26. Circumstances Pointing as Strongly...