...should have been instructed to find for defendant below. In support thereof, it is said that every person is presumed to have intended the natural and probable consequences of his own acts, and Wallach \, Wylie, 28 Kan. 152, is cited as conclusive that the mortgage of November...

...independent acts of the persons doing them, will not create a joint liability although the wrongs may person is presumed to have intended the natural and probable consequences of his acts. The defendant was. in violation of law, using means calculated to produce the alleged injury....

...however, may be presumed from the circumstances which surrounded the act.24 This is owing to the fact that a person is presumed to have intended the natural and probable consequences of his voluntaryact.26 No presumption arises, however, where the result is not the natural and probable...

...The rule applied in this instruction has its foundation in the principle of criminal law that every person is presumed to have intended the natural and probable consequences of his voluntary acts. The test of the criminal intent in the use of a deadly weapon is to be found, not...

...112 6 (Circumstantial evidence). Following are examples of this second class of presumptions : A sane person is presumed to have intended the natural and probable consequences of acts which he is shown to have committed. Persons shown to be acting as public officers are presumed...

...not know or intend the consequences. Senator O'CONOR. Is it not a well-accepted legal authority that a person is presumed to have intended the natural and probable consequences of his act? Mr. DURB. If you get the question of enactment and probable consequences of the act, you have...

...not know or intend the consequences. Senator O'CoNOR. Is it not a well-accepted legal authority that a person is presumed to have intended the natural and probable consequences of his act? Mr. DUHR. If you get the question of enactment and probable consequences of the act, you have...

...serious injuries; it does not include minor injuries such as a black eye or a bloody nose (see 2076). A person is presumed to have intended the natural...be presumed to have intended death or great bodily harm. The intent need not be directed toward the person killed nor must it exist for any particular...

...injuries such as a black eye or a bloody nose (see 2076). It may be inferred that a person intends the natural and probable consequences of an act purposely...likely to result in death or great bodily injury, it may be inferred that he intended death or great bodily harm. The intent need not be directed toward...

...existence of an intent. Thus the law presumes, and you would be justified in inferring that a person must have intended the natural and probable consequences of an act purposely done by him. The weight, if any, to be given an inference of the accused's intent must of course depend upon the...