 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1890 - 808 páginas
...other courts, in relation to fellow-servants, in which, broadly stated, it is said: " It is sufficient if they are in the employment of the same master,...same common work, and performing duties and services for the same general purposes. The rule is the same, though the one injured may be inferior in grade,... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1916 - 812 páginas
...that the employees need be engaged in the same common work at the same time. It seems to be sufficient if they are in the employment of the same master,...same common work, and performing duties and services for the same general purpose. See Hoar v. Merritt, 62 Mich. 386 (29 NW 15) ; Caniff v. Navigation Co.,... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1865 - 722 páginas
...or particular work. It is Slattery's Adm'r and Others v. The Toledo and Wabash Railroad. enough that they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common enterprise, both employed to perform duties and services tending to accomplish the same general purposes,... | |
 | 1888 - 556 páginas
...fellow-servants, the employees need not be at the same time engaged in the same particular work. It is sufficient if they are in the employment of the same master,...in the same common work, and performing duties and servive* for the same general purpose. The rule is the same, although the one injured may be inferior... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, Hiram Edward Sickels - 1873 - 780 páginas
...exempt the master from liability, that the sufferer and the one who causes the injury should be at the time engaged in the same particular work. If they...same common work and performing duties and services for the same general purposes, the master is not liable. These rules seem to have been laid down with... | |
 | Francis Wharton - 1874 - 960 páginas
...exempt the master from liability, that the sufferer and the one who causes the injury should be at the time engaged in the same particular work. If they...same common work, and performing duties and services for the same general purposes, the master is not liable. These rules £eem to have been laid down with... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1874 - 738 páginas
...injury — should be at the time engaged in the same operation or particular work. It is enough that they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common enterprise, both employed to perform duties and services tending to accomplish the same general purposes.... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1876 - 854 páginas
...liability, that the sufferer and the one who causes the Injury should be at the time engaged in tha same particular work. If they are in the employment...same common work and performing duties and services for tha same general purposes, the master is not liable. " But CHURCH, C. J ., in delivering the opinion... | |
 | William Wait - 1878 - 1004 páginas
...exempt the master from liability that the sufferer and the one who causes the injury should be at the time engaged in the same particular work. If they...same common work, and performing duties and services for the same general purposes, the master is not liable. JLaning v. New York Central R. R. Co., 49... | |
 | 1905 - 1120 páginas
...operation or particular work ; that It is enough to bring the case within the general rule of exemption if they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common enterprise, both employed to perform duties tending to accomplish the same general purposes ; or, in... | |
| |
... if they are in the employment of the same master, engaged in the same common enterprise, both employed to perform duties... 
