 | 1915 - 1336 páginas
...the liability of employers engaged in interstate commerce for injuries received by their employés while engaged in such commerce. But that was because...of the states in the absence of action by Congress. • » » The inaction of Congress, however, in no wise affected its power over the subject. * * *... | |
 | 1916 - 1336 páginas
...several states were regarded as determinative of the liability of employers * * * while engaged inj such commerce. But that was because Congress, although...of the states in the absence of action by Congress. * * » The inaction of Congress, however, in nowise affected its power over the subject. * » * And... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1912 - 410 páginas
...day, but in order to refresh the minds of the committee I will read it again. The Supreme Court said: True, prior to the present act the laws of the several...of the States in the absence of action by Congress. The inaction of Congress, however, in nowise affected its power over the subject. And now that Congress... | |
 | New York (State). Dept. of Labor - 1912 - 1080 páginas
...by prescribing the regulations which are embodied in the act in question? " In part, the court said: True, prior to the present act, the laws of the several...of the states in the absence of action by Congress. * * * The inaction of Congress, however, in no wise afl'ected its power over the subject. * » » And... | |
 | 1912 - 838 páginas
...Congress over the subject of commerce, must give way before the supremacy of the national authority." True, prior to the present act the laws of the several...of the States in the absence of action by Congress. (Sherlock v. Ailing, 93 US 99; Smith v. Alabama, 124 US 465, 473, 480, 482; Nashville &c. Railway v.... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1912 - 382 páginas
...to these powers, but it goes beyond that. The court says: "Prior to the present act the laws of tne several States were regarded as determinative of the...of the States in the absence of action by Congress. The inaction of Congress, however, in no wise affected its power over the subject. And now that Congress... | |
 | 1912 - 884 páginas
...regulate that subject, had not acted thereon, and ie because the subject is one which falls with•? in the police "power of the states in the absence of action by Congress. Sherlock T. Ailing, 93 US 99, 23 L. ed. 819; Smith T. Alabama, 124 US 405, 473, 480, 482, 31 L. cd.... | |
 | James Smith McMaster - 1912 - 784 páginas
...Congress over the subject of commerce, must give way before the supremacy of the national authority." True, prior to the present act, the laws of the several...of the States in the absence of action by Congress. Sherlock v. Ailing, 93 US 99, 23 L. ed. 819-, Smith v. Alabama, 124 US 465, 473, 480, 482. 31 L. ed.... | |
 | California Public Utilities Commission, Railroad Commission of the State of California - 1913 - 1430 páginas
...to this point, Mr. Justice Van Devanter, in delivering the opinion of the court, says at page 54 : "True, prior to the present act, the laws of the several...of the states in the absence of action by Congress (citing numerous authorities)." In the case of Southern Railway Company vs. Reid, 224 US 424, the question... | |
| |
True, prior to the present act, the laws of the several states were regarded as determinative of the liability of employers engaged in interstate commerce for injuries received by their employees while engaged in such commerce. But that was because Congress,... 
