...it clear that he would settle for nothing less. We define effective verification as being sure that if the other side moves beyond the limits of the treaty...deny the other side the benefit of the violation. Of course, our ability to detect and respond to violations helps to deter the other side from committing...

...evaluating whether the START Treaty is effectively verifiable is whether, if the other side attempts to move beyond the limits of the treaty in any militarily significant way, we would be able to detect such a violation well before it became a threat to national security so that we are able to respond. Additionally,...

...includes, among other elements, the ability to detect potentially militarily significant violations in time to respond effectively and thereby deny the other side the benefit of the violation. Our ability to detect and respond to violations helps to deter the other side from committing them...

...other side moves beyond the limits of the Treaty, we would be able to detect a militarily significant violation in time to respond effectively and thereby...deny the other side the benefit of the violation. Our ability to detect and respond to violations helps to deter the other side from committing them...

...raising the cost of potential cheating scenarios. We should also be able to detect Soviet violations in time to respond effectively and thereby deny the other side the benefit of any violation. The INF Treaty goes well beyond the reliance on NTMs which characterized previous nuclear...

...verification by stating: "What do we mean by effective verification? We mean that we want to be sure that, if the other side moves beyond the limits of the Treaty...deny the other side the benefit of the violation." Is this definition of "effective" verification acceptable for the CFE Treaty? 281 Answer. Ambassador...

...definitions given over time have differed somewhat, but Ambassador Paul Nitze's is generally accepted — if the other side moves beyond the limits of the Treaty...militarily significant way, we would be able to detect such a violation in time to respond effectively and thereby to deny the other side the benefit of the violation....

...that we want to be sure that if the other side moves beyond the limits of the Treaty in any military significant way, we would be able to detect such violation...deny the other side the benefit of the violation." Is this definition of "effective verification" acceptable for the START Treaty? If not, how would you...

...evaluating whether the START Treaty is effectively verifiable is whether, if the other side attempts to move beyond the limits of the treaty in any militarily significant way, we would be able to detect such a violation well before it became a threat to national security so that we are able to respond. Additionally,...

...verification by stating: "What do we mean by effective verification? We mean that we want to be sure that if the other side moves beyond the limits of the Treaty in any military significant way, we would be able to detect such violation in time to respond effectively...